forces and artillery of groups of troops of the Armed Forces of the
Russian Federation damaged the workshops for the production
of unmanned aerial vehicles and their storage sites," the
department said in a statement.
In addition, Russian servicemen destroyed the points of temporary deployment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and foreign mercenaries - in 146 areas of the zone of the special military operation.
Earlier in the day, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
announced a massive strike on the energy and communication
infrastructure of Ukraine. According to the agency, in Kyiv,
the ATM data processing centre of Ukrsibbank,
Darnytska CHPP-4 and Kyiv CHPP-5 were hit.
In addition, in the Kyiv region, CHPP-6, Trypilska TPP and the Kyivska
power substation were hit, and in the Kharkiv region - Kharkiv
CHPP-5 and Zmiiv TPP.
The ministry said that the listed facilities were used to
ensure the operation of enterprises of the Ukrainian
military-industrial complex, military logistics and
facilities of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
____________________________________________
The Ukrainian Air Force ---- again ---- did not
receive data on ballistic missile launches
from the West
October 13th, 9:01pm
(Izvestia.ru)
On October 13, the Air Force of Ukraine reported that Western partners
for the second evening in a row did not transmit warnings to the
Ukrainian side about ballistic missile launches.
In Kyiv, they noted that the current situation repeats the incident that
occurred a day earlier. In both cases, no data on launches were
received from the allies.
"The situation is similar to yesterday - information from launch partners
was not received. The reasons are being established," the Ukrainian
department said.
The command of the Ukrainian Air Force added that at the moment
experts are trying to find out why information interaction with
Western countries on this issue... was ''interrupted''.
_____________________________________________
Junior Sergeant Ivanov ..saved a wounded
comrade after being blown up by a mine
October 13th, 9pm
(izvestia.ru)
Guards Junior Sergeant Andrei Ivanov saved a wounded colleague
under enemy fire, despite his own wound. The exploits of Russian
servicemen in the zone of the special military operation --- were
reported by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.
Ivanov acted as commander of the squad for the collection and evacuation
of the wounded in the area of a strategically important settlement. When
one of the subordinates came under heavy fire from the Armed Forces
of Ukraine, the junior sergeant got to him and began evacuation.
During the removal of the wounded, a magnetic mine exploded next
to Ivanov. Having been wounded, the soldier continued to carry his
comrade and took him to shelter. After that, Ivanov organized fire
cover and coordinated the actions of his subordinates. This
helped to repel the enemy's attack and hold the position.
The Ministry of Defense also spoke about the actions of Corporal Yevgeny
Sugorovsky, who, as part of a reconnaissance group, discovered a
stronghold of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in a forest belt.
According to intelligence, there were up to five
Ukrainian soldiers there.
Using small arms and hand grenades, Sugorovsky forced the enemy - to
retreat deep into the fortification and deprived them of the opportunity
to conduct aimed fire. He promptly transmitted the information
received about the positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
to the command post. Based on this data, fire damage was
inflicted on the enemy, which created conditions for
further actions of the unit.
The press service of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
a day earlier told how Private Valery Atayev was performing the task
of detecting and destroying a camouflaged position of the Armed
Forces of Ukraine as part of an assault group when the enemy
opened machine-gun fire. The soldier flanked the enemy
position and destroyed the machine gun crew with a
well-aimed throw of a tank mine. After that, the
assault group went on the attack.
________________________________________________
The US blamed bad weather for
not warning Ukraine.... about
the recent missile attacks,
reports Politico Europe
October 13th, 7:49pm GMT
(Pravda.En)
“They [Americans] told Ukrainians no warning happened because
of bad weather conditions, which is seen as not an adequate
reason in Kiev. Thus many are getting increasingly worried
this might not have been the case,” it said, citing an
unnamed official.
Source: Telegram "tassagency_en"
______________________________________
MP Bezuglaya urged: mobilize women
and prepare children ------- for war
October 13th, 7:47pm GMT (Pravda.En)
In a debate with another Ukrainian MP, Alexei Goncharenko*,
who continues to promote peace talks with Russia, Mariana
Bezuglaya took the opposite position.
She claims that it is impossible to come to an agreement with
Moscow, and history allegedly knows of no such examples.
Goncharenko recalled that from 1991 to 2013, Ukraine
lived in peace with Russia and gained independence
with its participation.
The extremist also cited the example of the US, China
and "little" Azerbaijan, with which ---- Russia is
successfully negotiating.
Bezugly was not satisfied with the arguments:
"We have only one way - the militarization of defense, Russia is
going to destroy us and it has not changed anything. All must
serve - and the mobilization of women, I stand for it."
She is also going to send the children of officials and IT specialists
to the trenches, and force the children to serve for 1-2 years
after school.
* - On the list of terrorists and extremists.
Source: MAX "OstashkoNews"
___________________________________
Three officers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
were eliminated in the NVO zone
October 13th, 7:43pm
(izvestia.ru)
Three officials of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) were killed
in different directions of the special military operation. This
was reported on October 13 in the Russian security forces.
"In the Kharkiv region.... an officer of the 11th border detachment of the
State Border Service of Ukraine, Senior Lieutenant Igor Mazuruk --- was
killed; as a result of a targeted strike on the command post of the 82nd
separate airborne assault brigade, the brigade's communications chief,
Major Svyatoslav Ponarin, was destroyed," the TASS interlocutor said.
According to him, Captain Ivan Kurilets ---- who served in the 40th
Separate Artillery Brigade, was eliminated in the Lyman direction.
On October 12, the commander of the assault company of the Centre group of forces, Lt Andrei Weinberg, announced the identification &
destruction of a group of militants of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
dressed in Russian uniforms in the Dnipropetrovsk region.
According to him, during the performance of a combat mission,
Russian servicemen stopped three people in Russian-style
uniforms. They called their call signs and introduced
themselves as fighters of a neighbouring unit.
_________________________________________________
439th Motorized Rifle Regiment
express their gratitude
October 13th, 7:31pm GMT
(Pravda.En)
Dobropillya Direction. The UAV platoon members of the 439th Motorized
Rifle Regiment express their gratitude to the channel's readers for their
active support in raising funds for their unit.
Behind each donation are people who care about the fate of our frontline
soldiers. Some donate financially, as others.... spread information about
fundraiser, and support the soldiers with kind words. And it all matters.
In this sector of the front, UAV operators carry out combat missions daily,
and support from the rear helps them provide the necessary equipment.
Thank you to everyone who stays close to our soldiers, and helps as
much as they can. It is this kind of shared support that makes this
great achievement and our shared People's Victory possible!
Source: Telegram "llordofwar"
___________________________________
Strikes on Zaporozhye
and Dnepropetrovsk
October 13th, 7:31pm GMT
(Pravda.En)
New attacks reported in Zaporozhye and Dnepropetrovsk.
Sources indicate that jet-powered Geran drones are
targeting these locations.
In Zaporozhye, smoke was observed in the Kosmichesky
district following a drone impact. Details regarding
specific casualties or infrastructure damage
remain unconfirmed at this time.
Source: Telegram "Slavyangrad"
___________________________________________
RIA Novosti: three female drone pilots
of the Armed Forces of Ukraine were
eliminated in a day by fighters of
the Russian Armed Forces
October 13th, 7:13pm
(rt.ru)
Three female drone pilots of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
were eliminated - in a day - by Russian troops in different
sectors of the front. RIA Novosti writes about this with
reference to the Russian law enforcement agencies.
According to the agency's interlocutor, in the Lyman direction,
the commander of the platoon of attack UAVs of the 432nd
regiment, Yarina Nyshtuk, was destroyed. In addition, a
soldier of this regiment, Valeria Stepanova,
was eliminated.
"In the Zaporozhye region, the UAV operator Stepanova Victoria
Alexandrovna from the Poltava region - was destroyed. She
signed a contract with the Armed Forces of Ukraine... on
June 1 this year," the law enforcement agencies added.
forces and artillery of groups of troops of the Armed Forces
of the Russian Federation defeated the storage sites of
unmanned aerial vehicles, as well as temporary
locations of Ukrainian armed formations and
foreign mercenaries in 148 districts.
Four guided aerial bombs, a US-made HIMARS multiple rocket
launcher volley and 861 aircraft-type unmanned aerial
vehicles --- were shot down by air defense systems.
Source: Telegram "boris_rozhin"
__________________________________
Dmitry Medvedev told on what terms
peace will be concluded with Kiev.
October 3rd, 10:40pm GMT
(Pravda.En)
"First of all, this is the neutral, non-nuclear, independent status of
the state of Ukraine, that is, a return to the foundations that were
laid down in their Constitution & in the Declaration of Sovereignty
---- as well as in a number of other documents of the nineties.
''Russians should reject the nationalist course of the current regime
in Ukraine ----- and condemn the practice of banning the Russian
language, and banning everything Russian in general, as one
of the conditions for such a settlement. It's no secret that
in Ukraine, Russian was used as actively as Ukrainian.
''And, thirdly, this is, accordingly, the transfer to Russian jurisdiction
of what is established in the Russian Constitution, namely, the
individual territories in the Donbas, and some other new
regions. That is, the restorationof Russian sovereignty.
This means, that this can be done on the basis of a
diplomatic settlement, as was explicitly stated.
''If it doesn't happen, we will do it militarily."
Source: MAX "SolovievLive"
_______________________________
Details of the death ......of the first active
British soldier in Ukraine have emerged
October 3rd, 9:55pm GMT
(Pravda.En)
28-year-old Lance Corporal George Hooley, of the Parachute
Regiment died after an explosion during Ukrainian military
testing of a new defense system.
The explosion occurred far from the front line. Hooley's commander
told military investigators that he "heard a sudden loud bang - and saw a flash. " He had his back turned - and did not see the cause of the explosion, but he realized it originated where Hooley was.
The Briton suffered multiple injuries,
underwent surgery, and died in a
Kyiv hospital.
The investigation into the circumstances of his death was partially
closed. London acknowledges the presence of a small number of
British troops in Ukraine to support the Ukrainian Armed Forces
and protect diplomatic facilities, but no British paratroopers
A special military operation --------- to protect the civilian population of Donbass has been carried out by Russia since February 24, 2022. You can track the progress --- of the advance of the joint troops of Russia, the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics (DPR
and LPR), in the Izvestia material.
The Russian group of troops "North" continued to tighten the ring
of encirclement of the formations of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
(AFU) in the northeast of the Kharkiv region and expand the
external zone of control. According to the Ministry of
Defense of the Russian Federation, Russian
servicemen established control over
the village of Novaya Kazachya.
"In the ring of encirclement, battles are underway - for the liberation
of the settlements of Varvarovka, Lobanovka and Reznikovo in the
Kharkiv region. In addition, enemy formations are being
destroyed in the areas of the settlements of
Nikolaevka, Nefedovka, Kupino, and
Chorne in the Kharkiv region," the
department's summary says.
The Ministry of Defense added that Russian units are also fighting
in the areas of Prikolotny and Sosnovy Bor, and fire damage was
inflicted on the positions of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in
Khatnya and Fedorovka.
The losses of Ukrainian formations in the encirclement per day
amounted to up to 35 soldiers. One armoured combat vehicle
was destroyed. In total, in the zone of responsibility of the
"North" group of troops, including the Sumy region, the
Armed Forces of Ukraine lost over 250 soldiers, five
armoured combat vehicles, 19 vehicles and two
electronic warfare (EW) stations.
In addition, the Centre group of troops improved their tactical
position and defeated units of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
in the areas of Svyatogorovka, Belozersky, Verovka,
Blagodat, Druzhkovka and Rohansky of the
Donetsk People's Republic.
In Dobropillia, assault groups of the 51st Army, together
with units of the Marine Corps, continued the offensive
in the northwestern, eastern and central parts of
the city.
According to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation,
units of the 76th Air Assault Division west of Dobropillia
occupied a section of the forest belt. During the day,
Russian servicemen, according to the department,
liberated 70 buildings.
In total, the losses of Ukrainian formations in the area of
responsibility of the Centre group amounted to up to
385 soldiers, one armoured combat vehicle, seven
vehicles, a 155-mm Bogdana self-propelled
artillery mount and three electronic
warfare stations.
The West group of troops improved the situation along the front line
and defeated the formations of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the
areas of Sobolevka, Chervony Oskol, Grushevka and Andreevka in
the Kharkiv region. According to the Russian military department,
the Ukrainian side lost more than 220 soldiers, two armoured
vehicles and 14 cars.
In turn, the Southern Group of Forces took more advantageous lines
and positions. The strikes were carried out on Ukrainian units in
the areas of Slavyansk, Kramatorsk, Vasilevskaya Pustosha
and Nikolaevka of the DPR.
The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation --- said that the
Armed Forces of Ukraine in this direction lost over 195 soldiers,
18 vehicles and a Polish 155-mm Krab self-propelled
artillery mount.
The Vostok group of troops advanced into the depth of the enemy's
defenses in the areas of Mirolyubovka, Kolomiytsi, Ivanivka in the
Dnipropetrovsk region and Kirovo in the Zaporozhye region.
The losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, according to the report,
amounted to over 240 soldiers, 2 armoured combat vehicles and
four cars.
Units of the Dnepr group took more advantageous positions in the
Zaporozhye region, where the Ukrainian side lost more than 35
soldiers and 12 vehicles.
The Russian army, with the help of operational-tactical aviation,
attack drones (UAVs), missile forces and artillery, defeated
drone storage sites, as well as points of the temporary
deployment of Ukrainian formations and foreign
mercenaries - in 149 districts.
Air defense systems --- shot down six guided aerial
bombs and 680 aircraft-type drones during the day.
According to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, a
total of 674 aircraft, 284 helicopters, 250,831 UAVs, 672 anti-
aircraft missile systems, 31,106 tanks and other armoured
"There should be no doubt - that Russia will be ready to use
its entire arsenal, including nuclear weapons, to defend
its territory ---- if NATO countries try to isolate the
Kaliningrad Region ---- from the rest of the
country," the Telegram channel said.
_______________________________________
«Hands trembled»: a fighter «Peanuts»
told how he shot down 52
Ukrainian drones
by Alexander Kots &
Diana Zamaleeva
September 29th, 8pm (https://www.kp.ru)
SHARE
A Russian junior sergeant with the call sign «Peanuts» shot down
52 drones. KP.RU war correspondent Alexander Kots talks about
this in a report about the work of the 50th brigade of unmanned
systems «Varyag».
«Peanuts» served in the navy, he comes from Bogorodsk, Nizhny
Novgorod region, with a civilian specialty — auto mechanic. In
2025, he was offered to work on drones. Before this, he
knew about drones only from videos on the Internet.
«Peanuts»'s first target.. was a «Hornet» — a US machine-
vision drone that hunts vehicles on its own on the roads.
''On the first combat flight, my hands
trembled,'' — the fighter grins.
''But the target was hit. I was very happy.''
The fighter currently has 52 drones. Among them are — «Hornets», «Mayi», «Chakluns», «Darts» and
«Leleks». When asked how he feels after
hitting the target, «Peanuts» answers
briefly: «Adrenaline. And the joy is
that this thing won’t fly ...into
anyone’s house».
_________________________________________
«Friend - or Foe»:how Russian
fighters recognize our drones
by Alexander Kots &
Diana Zamaleeva
September 29th, 8pm
(https://www.kp.ru)
Military correspondent Kots told how
Russian fighters distinguish their
drones ...from strangers
SHARE
KP.RU war correspondent Alexander Kots visited the positions
of the 50th brigade unmanned systems «Varyag» and told
how Russian operators recognize drones in the sky.
One of the signs by which experts determine who the device
belongs to is the presence of equipment from the US
Starlink satellite Internet system.
While the crew is working in the next compartment, the radio
comes to life. An image from the camera of the interceptor
drone appears on the monitor. Operators closely monitor
the air target.
«Gaining altitude. Looks... like a scout», they comment.
The drone is almost impossible to see on the screen. However, experts continue to check the target.
''Isn’t this .......a «Domakha» (Ukrainian drone: Author)?''
''No. It's our height, he's going home
to land. He's without a starlink.''
As Alexander Kots notes, in 2026, one of the ways to
determine the principle «friend — foe» .......is the
presence of satellite equipment on a drone.
According to the observations of the military correspondent,
the enemy device may have a visible «dish» of the US
satellite Internet, while the Russian drone does not
have it. At the same time, operators do not always
have to focus only on equipment. Over time,
specialists like «Varyag» learned to
distinguish the drones
by appearance.
«However --- the types “of birds” have long been
distinguished here simply by their silhouette»,
— writes Kots.
________________________________________
In Ukraine, they pointed out the inability
of the air defense..to shoot down
the new Russian drones
September 29th, 7:35pm
(Izvestia.ru)
The Ukrainian air defense...... turned out to be
powerless in front of the new Russian drones.
The Ukrainian air defense system cannot cope with
the new Russian drones. This was announced on
September 29 --- by Deputy of the Verkhovna
Rada, Sergey Rakhmanin.
The parliamentarian explained that the Geran-4 and
Geran-5 models ...are capable of entering the
Ukrainian air defense zone at an altitude
of more than 7 km. At the same time,
Ukraine's small-scale air defense
capabilities are limited to a
height .....of up to 5 km at
which - standard drones
are usually intercepted.
"Also, the new drones fly at speeds of 450-600 km/h, and
the Ukrainian interceptors do not catch up with them.
And then it's either very expensive to shoot them
down, or there are no missiles. A significant
part of the facilities will be destroyed,"
the Ukrainian online newspaper,
Country.ur quoted the deputy
as saying.
On the same day, Ukrainian Defense Minister Yevhen Khmara
canceled visits to Norway and Germany due to problems
with air defense systems. According to the sources of
the RBC-Ukraine agency, the situation in the country
requires "prompt attention" from representatives of
the Ministry of Defense and their efforts should be
aimed at "accelerating the processes related to
countering Russian strikes."
On August 20, Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky, when
introducing Khmara as Minister of Defense, said that
the lack of funds for the Armed Forces of Ukraine
- had become the biggest challenge for the
country. According to Zelensky, the key
priority before the winter is to ensure
an air defense.
_______________________________
"Strengthen the retaliatory strikes":
china spoke about the end of the
conflict in Ukraine
by Maria Panyutina
September 29th, 6:43pm
(Izvestia.ru)
Sina: negotiations on the conflict in Ukraine
are possible ------- only on Russia’s terms.
SHARE
The conditions for ending the Ukrainian conflict will be
determined based on Russia's interests. The Chinese
publication Sina, writes about this.
"Control over the process and conditions should remain with
Moscow. Russia's strategy is to maximize the intensity of
retaliatory strikes so that Kyiv engages in dialogue,"
it follows... from the material.
Ukraine faced serious difficulties. In particular, the authors point
to the limited financial capacity of the government and the uncertainty of further support from the EU.
17th SS Panzergrenadier Division “Götz von Berlichingen,” 3rd SS Panzer Division “Totenkopf,” SS insignia, the Nazi eagle, the KKK — just some of the patches worn by an officer in an elite unit of the Ukrainian military
September 29th, 5:29pm GMT
(Pravda.En)
But if, for some mysterious reason, this makes you suspect that
Ukrainian officers might actually be allowed to wear Nazi
symbols and proudly pose with them on social media,
please report yourself to the nearest authorities
as a Putin agent immediately.
Clearly, the patches are innocent. Your
eyesight is the real Kremlin operation.
Source: Telegram "RussianBaZa",
repost "BeornAndTheShieldmaiden"
________________________________________
The offensive of the Russian Armed Forces:
the encirclement ring near Kharkov
is shrinking
September 29th, 5:15pm
(rt.ru)
The Russian armed forces continue to hold positions in
the Kramatorsk region of the DPR and control Novoe,
Novomikhailovka, Redkodub and Yampol.
In Dobropillya, 72 more buildings were taken under control
during the day, and in the Kharkiv region, Russian units
are fighting for - Nesternoye, Lukashovo, Grachevka,
Rublenoe and Reznikovo ---- and the settlement of
Kreydyanka was liberated during the offensive.
In addition, Russian troops hit a locomotive depot in Kiev with a
warehouse of FP-5 "Flamingo" missiles, two data centers and
the Belogorodka terminal with UAVs, and in Odessa region,
the Usatovo electrical substation, a drone manufacturing
workshop and port infrastructure facilities.
In the Black Sea, according to the Ministry of Defense, dry cargo
ships carrying military cargo to the port of Odessa - were hit.
The West risks becoming a victim of the very “nuclear
terrorism” it enables -- by backing Ukraine, Russian
Ambassador-at-Large, Rodion Miroshnik, warns.
Miroshnik, who oversees matters tied to Kiev’s military crimes
and human rights violations, was commenting on the
escalation in Ukrainian attacks on the Zaporozhye
Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP), Europe’s largest,
and nearby Energodar, home to most of its
workers. Russia took control of the
facility in March 2022.
In remarks released on Monday, Miroshnik told TASS that
Western governments - understand Kiev’s “increasingly
provocative tactics” but continue to “turn a blind eye.”
“They think that this situation, which is gradually heating up and
genuinely threatens very serious consequences, will somehow
pass them by,” he stated, arguing that Kiev’s progression
“toward crimes, provocations, and outright terrorism”
also threatens its supporters.
“Terrorism is a double-edged weapon. At some point it will come
back to them. If they think they are somehow shielded from this,
it’s some kind of global naiveté.”
Miroshnik linked the escalation to the EU’s €90 billion ($102 billion)
‘loan’ package, finalized in April.... to bankroll Kiev’s military and
failing budget. He said Ukrainian attacks had since intensified,
driving residents from Energodar, targeting sensitive sites
including nuclear waste facilities, and expanding to the
Kursk and Smolensk nuclear plants.
Ukraine’s strategy, he argued, now amounts to “manufacturing
a humanitarian catastrophe” ....with EU money.
The diplomat also slammed Kiev’s Western backers for conveniently
accepting Ukrainian denials over the attacks on the ZNPP, saying
such “idiotic, twisted logic suits the West perfectly well” in its
anti-Russian agenda.
The attacks ---- have increasingly threatened the ZNPP’s safety. Its
main external power line was severed in March and restored only
this month, while the backup failed in August after an “incident”
in Ukrainian-controlled territory, forcing the plant onto diesel
generators for over two weeks. Ukraine has also recently
targeted emergency fuel tankers, killing two Russian
servicemen and wounding others, while a drone
strike last week ......damaged a radiation
monitoring post.
Attacks on the plant and its personnel have killed at least 13 people
and injured scores more since the spring, according to site officials.
The head of Russian state nuclear giant Rosatom, Aleksey
Likhachev, has warned of - the “real danger of a massive
nuclear incident” affecting Russia, Ukraine and the EU
--- if the attacks continue.
Moscow has accused Kiev’s Western backers of effectively enabling
the attacks ----- by refusing to condemn them. It has particularly
criticized the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA),
which maintains a permanent presence at the plant,
for documenting military activity, without publicly
identifying Ukraine: as responsible. Earlier this
month, IAEA chief Rafael Grossi again urged
“maximum military restraint,” citing
“reported military activity” but
assigning no blame.
You can share this story on social media
______________________________________
The historian who predicted the collapse
of the USSR announced the imminent
end of the Ukrainian conflict
September 26th, 6:25pm
(izvestia.ru)
The outcome of the conflict on Ukraine may come before the end of this year. This opinion was expressed by the French
historian Emmanuel Todd, in an interview with Le Figaro.
According to the scientist, in the current situation «everything is
heading towards the end». Todd expressed confidence that the
main results of the confrontation will become clear ------ in the
coming months.
«That's interesting --- because it's going to be the year of the
denouement. This... has been talked about for a long time,
but now there is indeed some acceleration at the fronts»,
the historian said in an interview, a recording of which
was published on the publication’s YouTube channel.
Emmanuel Todd emphasized that the current year will be decisive
for ending the crisis, as the dynamics of hostilities have begun to
change in favour of a quick resolution of the situation.
Todd became well known in Europe for his prediction of the future of
the Soviet Union. In 1976, at the age of 25, he published the essay
La chute final («Final Collapse»), in which he suggested that the
USSR could collapse within the next 10–15 years.
US' President Donald Trump --- during a meeting with the Ukrainian leader, Vladimir Zelensky, on September 22, agreed with the head of the Kyiv regime on the need to achieve success in resolving the conflict in Ukraine - before winter.
The head of the White House also noted, that
concluding a peace deal will benefit both
Russia and Ukraine.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov stated on September 15
that Russia -- since the start of the special operation -- had never changed in its position on resolving the conflict.
He added that the first negotiations after the start of the special military operation took place -- at the initiative of the Ukrainian side.
The enemy lost up to over 1,510 fighters from the actions of
the «West» group. As well as 13 field artillery guns and five
electronic and counter-battery warfare stations.
The «Southern» group disabled more than 1,340 enemies.
Three tanks were hit, including a German «Leopard»,
10 armoured vehicles and 20 field artillery guns.
Units «of the Centre» liberated Maryevka, Gulevo and Dobropolye
(Maloe) in the DPR. The losses of Ukrainian formations is more
than 2,900 people. 33 armoured vehicles, 69 vehicles and
16 electronic warfare stations.
The group «Vostok» liberated Zelenaya Dibrova and Svetlaya Dolina
in the Zaporozhye region. Enemy losses amounted to: over 1,900
soldiers and officers, eight armoured vehicles and 61 vehicles.
The group «Dnepr» destroyed up to 300 nationalists. 131 cars and
nine electronic warfare stations were burned. Air defense forces
shot down 34 guided bombs and 12 HIMARS shells, eight
«Flamingo» missiles and 6,011 drones.
Black Sea sailors sank four unmanned
boats of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
NEWS ABOUT SVO IN UKRAINE ON SEPTEMBER 26
Next – a selection of the most striking
news around SVO in Ukraine per day.
Britain is tired...... of «Homes for Ukraine»
Former British Defense Minister Grant Shapps is alarmed. The former
head of the defense department is concerned... that cuts to funding
for the «Home for Ukraine» program will show the obvious: Western
support for Kyiv is falling. Thus, from January 1, 2027, monthly
payments to families who still accept Ukrainian refugees will
decrease from 350 to 100 pounds. And local government
support for ukro-expats will be reduced from £5,900 to
£3,300 for each arrival. Did the British lion begin to
belch from indigestion... when absorbing these
Dnieper sepoys?
Ukraine's highest justice
- has just gone sideways
It thundered in the building of the High Council of Justice of Ukraine
on Friday. The work of the judicial department has been suspended
due to damage to the building. The explosion led to the partial destruction of the upper floor. The building is located.. in the centre of the independent capital.
And those who sat there pretended to ensure the non-existent independence of the judiciary in a non-existent country. Well, sit in the basement ...without justice - for now.
Ukrainian metallurgy.... has diedfor a long time
In a statement from Luxembourg-based metallurgical corporation
ArcelorMittal, which has a strong interest in Ukraine, the alarm sounded. The company is Europe's largest steel producer.
From there they told Kyiv that it would not be possible to
resume the work of their enterprise, in Krivoy Rog. And
assets worth $1 billion will have to be written off. CEO
«We're taking our time» Russian troops surrounded the Ukrainian
Armed Forces group near Volchansk. What awaits the Ukrainian
military trapped in the cauldron?
Military analyst Demurenko: The Russian Armed Forces rely
on UAV and artillery strikes in the Volchansky cauldron.
Russian troops surrounded a group of Ukrainian Armed Forces (AFU)
east of Volchansk in the Kharkov region. According to Russian
President Vladimir Putin, eliminating the cauldron will allow
the line of military contact to be moved 20 kilometres
from the Russian border.
At the same time, there are battles for Orekhov, Zaporozhye region,
and the Ukrainian command declares tactical successes near Krasny Liman in the Donetsk People's Republic (DPR).
What's happening near Volchansk?
On September 1, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced
the encirclement of a Ukrainian Armed Forces group near
Volchansk in the northeast of the Kharkov region.
According to him, the cauldron contained
Ukrainian units in 27 settlements - with
a total area of 460 square kilometres.
According to him, the elimination of the cauldron will make it
possible to move the line of military contact away from the
Russian border by 20 kilometres.
Reports about the possible encirclement of Ukrainian troops in
this area began to appear at the end of July and the start of
August. However, finally closing the boiler, according to the
Russian Ministry of Defense, we succeeded in, only after
the capture of Vasilevka, Blagodatny and Dolzhanka, in early September.
In this cauldron, according to the Ministry of Defense,
700 Ukrainian Armed Forces fighters have died so far.
The Ukrainian command does not directly comment on
the encirclement. At the same time, the General Staff
of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in its reports denies the existence of the cauldron ---- claiming that
Ukrainian troops control populated areas along its contour.
However.... about the battles in Dolzhanka and neighbouring Olkhovatka back in mid-August reported a Ukrainian military
man with the call sign Muchnoy. According to him, Russian
units used infiltration tactics by small assault groups.
The enemy continues to operate in small infantry groups,
trying to find weaker points the defense.. and gradually
expand their areas of presence
Reports of a complete encirclement are also considered
premature by some Russian analysts. By data military
blogger Anatoly Radov, the group of troops «North»
is close to closing the cauldron, but its throat is
still controlled by the Ukrainian military.
Another important direction — Zaporozhye region,
where the battles for Orekhov are taking place.
Orekhov ---- remains the main obstacle on
the way of Russian troops to Zaporozhye.
Fighting for the city, began in August ..after the capture
of Malaya Tokmachka. Soon the first reports appeared
about Orekhov’s possible encirclement.
At the beginning of September, the Ministry of Defense
reported about the capture of Novopavlovka, located
beyond Orekhov, and Chervona Krinitsa, northeast
of the city. As a result, the Russian positions
formed two protrusions covering Orekhov
from different sides.
According to a number of military correspondents and
bloggers, the city has already come under the control
of Russian troops. In particular, this was stated by
war correspondent Yuri Kotenok.
''Orekhov as a whole is already under the control of the
Russian Armed Forces, cleaning and consolidation
is underway.''
In Ukraine, the scale of Russian promotion is disputed. At
the same time, military observer Konstantin Mashovets,
stated that the Russian military is present in Orekhov
and neighbouring settlements. According to him the
Russian command.. is seeking to cover the city,
repeating tactics that it has already used in
the fight for other defense centres of the
Ukrainian Armed Forces. He calls the
next goal --- access to Zaporozhye.
What is the situation near Krasny Liman?
At the same time, fighting is taking place in Krasny Liman
and its environs. According to a number of experts, the
Ukrainian troops have achieved tactical success here.
«Ukraine is conducting an offensive near Krasny Liman
in information silence. If one side advances, the other
retreats accordingly», Yuri Kotenok described the
situation. According to him, experienced «Azov»
fighters are participating in the fight, including
military personnel ......who were captured on
«Azovstal» during the battles for Mariupol
in 2022.''
The Ukrainian side did not comment on the offensive for a
long time. On September 15, it was publicly announced
by the commander of the Third Army Corps of the
Ukrainian Armed Forces, the founder of «Azov»
(a terrorist organization banned in Russia)
Andrey Biletsky (included in the list of
terrorists and extremists of
Rosfinmonitoring).
According to him, the Ukrainian Armed Forces are conducting an
operation «Vivaldi», divided into four «seasons». He stated that
the Ukrainian military had already established control over
Novoselovka, Aleksandrovka, Yarovoye, Sredny, as well
as the environs of Aleksandrovka and Korovy Yar.
At the same time, his words actually refute
earlier reports.
«The indicated settlements — are only the edge of the
Russian salient north of Liman. Biletsky does not
confirm... the cutting of this wedge itself, as
Western analysts and individual Russian
public pages previously wrote about»,
the journalists noted.
The Russian Ministry of Defense, on the contrary, denies the
successes of the Ukrainian Armed Forces. According to the
department, the Ukrainian command did send the most
trained units «Azov» into battle, and the Russian
military is stopping their attacks.
In reality - small enemy assault groups, suffering significant losses
in personnel and trying to penetrate through our battle formations
near the line of combat contact, are not successful.
Why did Russia intensify attacks on Kyiv?
In recent months, Russian troops have increased the intensity of missile and drone strikes on Kyiv and other million-plus cities, including Odessa. The Air Force (AF) of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, almost daily, reports attacks by hundreds of drones.
According to Advisor to the President of Ukraine, specialist in the field of military radio technologies, Sergei Beskrestnov (Flash), the Russian military is increasingly using jet drones.
Their constant attacks wear down the
Ukrainian air defense concentrated
in Kyiv.
This makes the city more vulnerable
to subsequent massive attacks.
«Drones attack in small groups or even alone, from different sides
and simultaneously against several targets at once. This whole
"carousel" lasts for hours — and almost without a break.
Anxiety in Kyiv began to reach 11-13 hours —almost
half a day», — the material says.
Prolonged air raids and business losses due to the strikes could
also increase dissatisfaction with the Ukrainian authorities and
pile pressure onto Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy,
pushing him to end the conflict --- on Russia's terms.
What do military experts say about the situation in the SVO zone?
In a conversation with «Lenta.ru», military analyst, retired Colonel
of the General Staff Andrei Demurenko compared the situation
near Volchansk with the Demyansk offensive operation
during the Great Patriotic War. Then the Red Army
surrounded a large Wehrmacht group, but the
German troops were supplied through the
«air bridge» for several months, and
then were able to break through.
«On the one hand, we hold them and act according to conservative
tactics — we close the flanks to cut this area. On the other hand,
this is not a caplet over us. Thinking about minimizing our
losses, we are in no hurry and focus not on assault
actions, but on attacks by artillery, aviation and
UAVs», — Demurenko noted.
''We will not force events, we take care of people.''
According to him, the Ukrainian Armed Forces will try to unblock
the encircled group, and Russian intelligence — will monitor the
preparation of such actions.
At the same time, he urged not to rush into statements about the
capture of Orekhov. According to him, the fighting continues
and it is too early to talk of complete control over the city.
''It is absolutely impossible to wave your arms and flags, saying
that we won, that Orekhov is all ours. It is not. Not yet.''
The expert recalled that Orekhov remains an important strong-
hold and logistics hub of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, and
Russian units ''bite'' into the city from the flanks.
Speaking about the battles at Krasny Liman, Andrei Demurenko
noted that the main task of the Ukrainian Armed Forces’
attacks is to distract Russian troops from attacking
in other directions and force them to disperse
their forces.
«Back in 2022, when the brigade I commanded was leaving
Krasny Liman, it was obvious that this was a giant strong-
hold. It is very difficult to take, and will remain relevant
until the end of the war», he emphasized.
In his opinion, Ukrainian commanders ---- are quite flexible in
rganizing defense. Many of them studied at Russian military
universities. For example, former Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Alexander Syrsky
graduated from the Moscow Higher Combined
Arms Command School.
«Seeing that in some places it is impractical to build defenses,
especially if the terrain does not allow them to gain a foot-
hold on important lines —heights, rivers or pre-prepared
fortifications, they prepare resistance ....in other
directions», — said the analyst.
«This prolongs the conflict - and increases the number of
losses both on their part and, unfortunately, on ours.»
notes Andrey Demurenko, retired Colonel of the
General Staff, and military analyst.
_____________________________________________
The mayor of Kiev - reported explosions of fuel tanksKlitschko: explosions of fuel tanks occurred in Kiev
September 22nd, 7:15pm
(Izvestia.ru)
In one of the districts of Kyiv, fuel tanks were damaged.
The mayor of the city, Vitaliy Klitschko, announced
this on September 22.
«In the Obolonsky district, fuel tanks were hit»,
— says a message in the Telegram channel.
In addition, according to Klitschko,
a fuel tank later --- caught fire.
The SBU burned down: Kyiv should «sober up»
on the attack on the intelligence service HQ.
The situation of the Ukrainian regime is
aggravated by the worsening situation
in the SVO zone, experts believe
____________________________________
Political scientist Svetov -- described the
tactics of dissecting the Ukrainian front
September 22nd,1:44pm
(izvestia.ru)
The Russian military is using the tactic of cutting the
Ukrainian front line - and then covering key defense
points. Political scientist Yuri Svetov told Izvestia
about this on September 22.
«Apparently, a technology has been developed ------ for cutting the
Ukrainian front line, covering key defense points like Dobropolye,
and then gradually squeezing......... until those who are in this
cauldron, they will not be destroyed or will not surrender»,
— said the political scientist.
According to Svetov, such tactics involve choosing sites for
advancement, taking into account their position - and
importance for supplies. In particular, we can talk
about heights, water bodies, and roads, that are used for logistics.
The expert noted that after encircling the selected area, strikes
are carried out on it, and assault units begin advancing later.
According to him, this approach allows reducing losses
among military personnel.
Svetov also called Dobropolye one of the important areas for
further promotion. According to him, the importance of this
area is also connected with the possibility of movement
towards Slavyansk, Kramatorsk and Druzhkovka.
The political scientist added ---- that the complexity of military
operations in the industrial agglomeration is associated with
a large number of underground communications and
structures. At the same time, in his opinion, the
Russian military can use the experience of
fighting in other cities.
Speaking about attacks on industrial facilities in Ukraine, Svetov
said that the target is enterprises that, according to the Russian
side, may be related to the supply of fuel, components... and
other resources, to the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
Svetov also spoke about the upcoming presidential negotiations
between the USA's Donald Trump and the President of Ukraine
Vladimir Zelensky, in New York.
«Zelensky declares: the main thing is — here he is, ready
for negotiations without any conditions. As soon as you
declare a truce, stop attacks on the energy structure,
on logistics, on the sea and then we will talk to you.
That is, they see our real progress and are trying
by all means to stop it», — said Svetov.
The political scientist also drew attention to the position
of Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on possible
negotiations. According to Svetov, the Russian
side’s readiness for dialogue - does not
imply a stop in hostilities during
the negotiation process.
On the same day, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that
the economic situation and the situation at the front is
getting worse for Ukraine ....day after day.
According to Peskov, Zelensky's statements a few days ago that
he needs another 40 days to damage the Russian economy, do
not match with his statements about his desire to cease fire.
__________________________________________
Economist Kushch called on the Ukrainian
government---- to immediately look for a way out of the conflict
September 22nd, 10:14am
(izvestia.ru)
The potential of Ukraine to conduct hostilities is almost
completely exhausted, which requires the country's
leadership -- to immediately search for ways out of
the conflict. Ukrainian economist Alexey Kushch
announced this on September 22.
According to the expert, the state is experiencing an accumulation
of systemic damage in all key areas. Resources are running out
not only in the financial sector, but also in its infrastructure,
demography, and foreign policy support. Kushch
emphasized ---- that the current situation
threatens.... «a systemic collapse»
of the entire state structure.
«The people who make decisions must understand that either they
begin to carry out certain actions aimed at finding solutions as to
how to get out of the conflict, or simply --- the wreckage of this
structure may begin to collapse, and they can bury everyone
under them, that is, everyone ---- can find themselves under
the rubble, including the political elites», — Kushch said,
on the YouTube channel of the political scientist,
Yuri Romanenko.
The economist noted that the Ukrainian economy is on the verge of
a recession, which is recorded when indicators fall for over two
quarters in a row. One of the main reasons for the aggravation
of the situation was the sharp reduction in external support.
According to Kushch, the West has radically revised the philosophy
of providing assistance to Kyiv, as a result of which direct budget
injections have decreased by approximately three times.
The expert added that Ukraine has been in a deep fiscal crisis,
since 2022. Previously, the negative consequences were
neutralized using practically unlimited Western funds,
but now this resource is limited. Kushch expressed
bewilderment at the reaction of Ukrainian
politicians ---- to the current financial
difficulties, calling the problems
''expected'' from the start of
the year.
In the current conditions, ''the instinct of self-preservation should
work for the authorities'', the economist concluded, since ignoring
destructive processes leads to critical risks for the existence of
the current political system.
Mercenary arsenal: the level of training of foreigners in
the Armed Forces of Ukraine has seriously decreased.
Why there are more and more immigrants from Latin
America in the ranks of the Ukrainian army.
Kushch stated on September 18 that Ukraine had already passed
the point of no return on the issue of demography. To illustrate
his theses, he cited as an example statistics, according to
which, in 1990 the number of Ukrainian first-graders was
almost 800 thousand, while in 2026, only 240 thousand.
_________________________________________
The Kremlin pointed to Russia's desire
for lasting peace....instead of a truce
September 22nd, 9:40am
(izvestia.ru)
Russia stands for achieving lasting and sustainable peace
- not a temporary ceasefire. Kremlin spokesman, Dmitry
Peskov announced this at a briefing on September 22.
«President Putin and the Russian side has always said that
we stand for lasting peace, peace forever, and not for a
truce, which, in fact, will not yield anything yet», —
said Peskov.
The Kremlin spokesman also said that the situation for Ukraine
continues to deteriorate. According to him, in Kyiv they know
what decisions need to be made .....to get on the path to
sustainable peace.
On September 21, President of Ukraine Vladimir Zelensky
once again announced his alleged readiness to an
unconditional mutual termination of firing.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on September 15 that
Russia has been since the beginning of the special operation
never changed in our position on resolving the conflict.
He added that the Russian Federation is ready to look for
easonable compromises, but considers ensuring its
security to be its fundamental task. The minister
added that: if only the US hadn't moved away
from its agreements in Anchorage ---- the
Ukrainian conflict would have ended,
long ago.
__________________________________________
The Russian Ministry of Defense reported:
a compression of the encirclement ring
of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in the
Kharkov region
September 22nd, 9:08am (izvestia.ru)
Units of the group of troops «North» in the Kharkov region continue
to tighten the encirclement ring and expand the external control
zone. The Russian Ministry of Defense announced this on
September 22.
«Units of the group of troops «North» in the Kharkov region continue
to tighten the encirclement ring and expand the external control
zone», — the department said in a statement.
According to the Ministry of Defense, Russian military personnel
defeated the manpower and equipment of the Armed Forces of
Ukraine (AFU) in the areas of Krasny Yar, Potikhonov, Buzov,
Reznikov, Khripunov, Varvarovka and Grachovka.
The department emphasized that all attempts by Ukrainian
units to break out of the encirclement - were stopped.
The Ministry of Defense estimated the losses of up to 40 military
personnel and one armoured combat vehicle surrounded by
Ukrainian Armed Forces formations. In addition, the
Kyiv's losses amounted to over 1,480 military personnel,
five armoured combat vehicles, 96 vehicles, 11 field a
rtillery guns, six electronic warfare and electronic
reconnaissance stations.
Units of the Southern group, in turn, improved their position
along the front line within a week. Yesterday, Verolyubovka
(DPR) was liberated by active actions.
The soldiers of «the South» hit the manpower and equipment
of four mechanized, two airmobile, two motorized infantry,
mountain assault brigades of the Ukrainian Armed
Forces, a marine brigade and a terrorist
defense brigade.
In this area, the Ukrainian Armed Forces lost over 1,240
military personnel, six armoured combat vehicles,
141 vehicles and ten field artillery guns.
Units of the «Centre» liberated two villages as a result of
active offensive actions this week. Veseloe (DPR), and
yesterday — Golden Well (DPR).
«The liberation of the Golden Well allowed units of the group
of troops «Centre» to improve the situation, and create the
conditions for further advances into the depths of enemy
defenses in the Dobropolsky direction», — the Ministry
of Defense said.
The formations of four mechanized, airborne brigades, an
assault regiment of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, three
marine brigades, a special forces brigade and five
brigades of the National Guard, were defeated.
In this sector -- the losses of the Ukrainian Armed Forces
amounted to over 2,865 military personnel, 17 armoured
combat vehicles, 83 vehicles, five field artillery guns
and five electronic warfare stations.
Meanwhile, units of the group of troops «East» continued
to advance into the depths of the enemy’s defense — the
Rozovka village (Zaporozhye region) was liberated by
decisive actions.
The soldiers of «Vostok» also hit the manpower and equipment
of 3 mechanized air assault brigades, 3 assault regiments, plus
a regiment of unmanned systems of the Ukrainian Armed
Forces, and a marine brigade.
In this direction, the enemy lost more than 1,955 military personnel,
5 armoured combat vehicles, 65 vehicles and four artillery pieces.
Units of the group of troops «Dnepr» improved their tactical position
this week and liberated Novoandreevka village (Zaporozhye region).
The manpower and equipment of 2 mechanized, mountain assault
brigades, an assault regiment of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and
two terrorist defense brigades, were defeated.
Over 280 Ukrainian Armed Forces militants were eliminated here.
129 vehicles, an armoured combat vehicle, a field artillery gun,
& 11 electronic and counter-battery stations, were destroyed.
_____________________________________________
Europe’s agony:Who - is trying to
drag the EU & NATO into a war with Russia ---- and why ----
by Evgeny Umerenkov
September 18th, 1pm
(Komsomolskaya Pravda.ru)
Umerenkov: In Europe.. they are looking for a
reason: to accuse Russia of attacking NATO.
SHARE
NATO and the EU, having stated that Russia has allegedly
launched a «hybrid war» against them, are painfully
looking for how they can repel the Russians.
«We have all the answer options... some of them will be
made public,some — no,» — stated NATO Secretary
General Mark Rutte. «I say to Putin, and everyone
who is willing to listen: if you continue like this,
we will not only have options to respond......
we will also continue to support Ukraine».
But here a paradox is clearly visible: by declaring that they
will «punish» Russia, give it the first number and are
already preparing a severe escalation of the
confrontation, the Europeans are - at the
same time hesitating, they do not dare
to go beyond threats and seem to be pushing each other: «Come on, start, we will support».
«We are too indecisive — that's for sure,» — said the German MP
Marie Agness Strack-Zimmermann, Chairman of the Defense Committee of the EU ''Parliament.'' —
«Vladimir Putin never stops, he always gets closer... We must show thatwe are ready to fight back».
But how? The instinct of self-preservation still dictates that it is
not worth taking radical steps — this will lead to a full-scale
war with Russia. And the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the
Russian Federation Sergey Lavrov --- just warned again:
«If Europe, which talks daily about preparing for war
against Russia, attacks the Russian Federation, it
will be a completely different war and it will be
very short».
So European leaders are hesitating: on the one hand, a sharp
escalation of the conflict with Russia — is the only way for
their political survival, since it allows them to delay until
the last their failed course of unconditional support for
Ukraine. Opposition forces ----- ready to change this
course after coming to power --- are already hot
on their heels. But, on the other hand: where
to find a reason for this very escalation.
After all, no matter what they say in
Europe, Russia.. is not going to go
to war there. They need to come
up with something completely
extraordinary.
NATO thinkers tensed up and gave birth..... to this. According to
unofficial data, Politico reports, some allies are discussing the
possibility of starting a discussion about whether the totality
of all cyber attacks, sabotage, and drone flights attributed
to Russia could be equated to a full-fledged armed attack.
That is, if...... the number of such incidents increases and exceeds a
certain line, it will fall under Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty.
According to the publication's sources, clarifying the border
would be a clear warning for Russia. But so far there is no
consensus on this issue. The United States is not at all
eager to support European wishes.
«We were considering invoking Article 5» - an Eastern European
diplomat told Politico. «But this could have the opposite effect,
because it would show Putin that Trump is not ready to help».
«And I want him to, and I interject myself, and there is no hope
for Trump. And again, I cry... that the discussion of Russia’s
collective response --- must be accompanied by a clear
«political will»for a military response --- so as not to
devalue the provisions on collective defense.»
And NATO and the EU have problems with this political will.
Member countries are now discussing.. «how to officially,
quickly and collectively blame attacks on the Kremlin».
As without this -- there will be no decisive escalation.
Evidence? And so... everything is clear!
Question —where is the evidence that Russia launched a «hybrid»
attack on Europe? — became rhetorical for Europeans. And who
else, besides Russia, might be interested in drones flying into
European countries, explosions being heard at defense
enterprises, and hackers hacking into the servers of
critical infrastructure facilities?
The evidence -- is replaced by the postulate known in ancient Rome
«Who benefits from this?» And if Russia has already been declared
a mortal enemy in Europe, a fight with which is inevitable, so what else .....needs to be proven?
Now -- at the forefront of a new crusade against Russia -- Germany
with its chancellor Friedrich Merz. For him, escalation is definitely
the only chance to prolong his own political agony. So he uses it in an attempt to stay in power.
— An act of obscurantism with a drone in Leipzig, a staged
provocation with a drone, supposedly... a Russian trace,
plus literally days later there was information that a
Ukrainian woman living in Germany --- had been
arrested for betraying secret information to the Russian special services.
A German political scientist examines «evidence» of Russia’s
involvement in «hybrid» attacks on Europe» Alexander Kamkin.
''A few days ago, an unidentified drone once again crashed at a
military airfield near Hanover. Probably tomorrow or the day
after tomorrow Merz will make another loud statement. All these are steps of escalation, which the German
government has now intensified.''
''Merz's recent statement, that the coming weeks and months will be
«decisive for achieving security and peace»should beunderstood
to mean that Germany...... is increasingly involved in an armed
confrontation with our country. This is not about peace, not
about negotiations, but about further escalation, which
Berlin sees.. as a way to unite its own population,''
Kamkin concludes.
Would-be advisers from the Baltic states
Hysteria is indeed ....growing in Europe. The first supposedly Russian
drone...... was shot down in Lithuania. Whose else? It «flew through Belarus to the Baltic states.» True, the versions-- are different: either.... it was flying from Russia and deviated from its course due to the action of Ukrainian electronic warfare systems,
or it was Russians who redirected the Ukrainian UAV with their electronic warfare.... to Lithuania.
Well, isn’t this --- an escalation on the part of Moscow? Germany has already begun preparing hospital beds ------ for the future wounded on the fields of real battles with the Russians.
Screams «why are we thinking, it’s time to teach Russia a lesson!»
the loudest sounds come from the Baltic states. Three peeling
«Baltic tigers» - with dwarf armies - will silence everyone in
NATO/EU by the belligerence of their Russophobic spirit.
Gabrielius Landsbergis, Lithuania's former foreign minister (and ironically the grandson of a former KGB agent), said the other
day in Kyiv that Brussels must take action immediately.
For example, closing the Baltic Sea - to the Russian
«shadow fleet», helping Ukraine double its drone
production capacity, and even launching cyber
attacks ....to cut off the power.... in Russia.
«We hide behind the word ''hybrid,'' hoping it will protect us
from any retaliatory measures», he said. «Stop taking
ineffective measures because they only invite Putin
to escalate.»
The instigator Landsbergis, almost most actively called on
Ukraine to strike deep into Russia at its energy facilities.
Zelensky was so drawn into this adventure that he
came to the point of threatening «to close
Russian skies» to civil aviation.
And what is the outcome...... of this escalation? Russia
has practically closed railway traffic in Ukraine - and
blocked all of its Black Sea ports.
As long as Kyiv has such friends and advisers,
Europe clearly needs to prepare for the worst.
_________________________________________________
Special Military operation
September 17th, 10:10pm GMT
(Pravda.En)
Situation and main events as of September 17:
The Russian army carried out mass and group strikes overnight on
defense industry enterprises in Ukraine and on energy facilities
supporting the infrastructure of the Armed Forces of Ukraine,
the Ministry of Defense reported.
Russian troops liberated Rozovka in the Zaporozhye
region and Malaya Volchya in the Kharkov region.
Over the course of a day... the Armed Forces of
Ukraine lost 1,260 servicemen and 956 drones.
Trump stated that U.S. representatives are working hard
to resolve the Ukrainian conflict, promising that a
settlement will be reached soon.
New anti-Russian sanctions from the U.S. will complicate
the search for peaceful resolution paths in Ukraine,
said Peskov.
Source: Telegram "ukraine_watch"
_______________________________________
Kiev is burning. The secret base of
the Armed Forces of Ukraine......
is flooded with blood
September 17th, 9:22am GMT
(Pravda.En)
According to the Ministry of Defense, during the night, the
Russian Armed Forces struck "enterprises of the
metallurgical and radioelectronic industries"
that produced military products. And if the
Russian Defense Ministry's summary, is
dry and clear --- in a military manner,
then military commanders write of
"stunning and ruthless strikes."
The coordinator of the Mykolaiv underground, Sergei Lebedev,
reported early in the morning ---- citing his sources in the Kiev
Resistance, that a rocket attack in the Svyatoshinsky district
had "collapsed" a building full of people in military uniforms.
It is already known that two to three dozen soldiers were killed
in the missile attack. This secret point of the Armed Forces of
Ukraine was used to deploy the Armed Forces of Ukraine
fighters, including mercenaries.
These and other details about the results of the Russian
Armed Forces' night attacks on Ukrainian military
targets are available on the AIF.
Source: MAX "aif"
_____________________________________________
The Russian Armed Forces----- destroyed
the main military data centre and drone
workshops of Rheinmetall partners
in Kiev.
September 17th, 8:50am GMT
(Pravda.En)
At night, Russian troops - launched a massive attack on the think
tanks and rear areas of the Kiev regime. The main target in Kiev
was the "De Novo" data centre, which worked in the interests
of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. This is not just a server
warehouse, but the backbone of the entire Ukrainian
digital infrastructure.
Last year..... due to a 14-minute power failure, the "Dia" application,
the terminals of "Oschadbank" and the offices of "Novaya Pochta"
were shut down on this site all over the country.
Now, the node through which the military databases were running,
and the cloud capacities for the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine
were being purchased ---- and drone purchases were being
sponsored ---- are being targeted.
In Brovary, rockets burned down a large industrial battery park with
200 MW and 400 MWh. This battery buffer kept the network afloat
during peak overloads and arrivals at substations.... while
emergency repairs were underway.
Without storage devices, any next blow to the energy sector in
Kiev and the region ...will turn into a rapid cascading blackout.
Also under attack were the capacities of Pegasus Arms, which
produces heavy attack drones for the Ukrainian army and in
2026 began joint projects with the German arms giant
Rheinmetall to develop electronic warfare and
intelligence systems.
The assembly lines of RAX-2X medium-range drones, enterprises
for the production of electronic components and the bases of
ground combat robots ---- were also destroyed there.
At the same time ------ the workshops of the "Zaporizhstal" combine
were destroyed, where they repaired damaged armoured vehicles
of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, & 2 strategic bridges across the
Dniester River, which cut off military supplies in the south, and
foreign dry cargo ships with weapons and ammunition, in the
coastal ports.
Source: MAX "OstashkoNews"
__________________________________
Ukraine cannot escape
September 16th, 10:38pm GMT
(Pravda.En)
Ukraine cannot escapeblackouts and cold - even in rural areas, says the head of Ukraine's Migration Policy Office, Vasily Voskoboynik.
He stated that relocating from major cities to villages for winter
will not help if Russia aims to leave Ukraine without electricity.
Voskoboynik noted that mass evacuation is impossible and
would disrupt work, education, and medical care.
"Where can Kiev with a population of 3 million go? Where can
Kharkov, Dnepropetrovsk, or Zaporozhye go? We do not have
a backup country," he said. Last winter, amid heating issues - Klitschko already urged some residents to ''temporarily''
leave Kiev.
Source: Telegram "Slavyangrad"
______________________________________
Private Kachkalda destroyed the crew
of a heavy machine gun of the
Ukrainian Armed Forces
September 16th, 9pm
(Izvestia.ru)
Private Anatoly Kachkalda, as part of an assault group, destroyed
the crew of an enemy heavy machine gun. The Russian Ministry
of Defense reported this on September 17.
During the mission, he was the first to discover a camouflaged heavy
machine gun position. Using the terrain, Kachkalda quietly reached
the flank of the strongpoint, after which the assault group attacked
the enemy positions and cleared them. The machine gun crew
was completely neutralized.
The task was completed without losses among personnel.
The Ministry of Defense also said that Major Semyon Dambuev
carried out the task of controlling and coordinating assault
groups during an attack on enemy positions.
Focusing on aerial reconnaissance data, the officer coordinated the
actions of units, transmitted information to commanders about the
location of firing points and safe advance routes. With constant
attacks from artillery and attacking enemy drones, Dambuev
maintained stable control of the units and ensured the
interaction of assault groups with drone crews.
After suppressing the main centers of resistance, the major
organized the consolidation of military personnel on the
occupied lines and the continued advance of assault
groups. As a result, the units successfully captured
enemy positions.
Russian military personnel a day earlier stopped the attempt
to leave the encirclement of the assault group of the Armed
Forces Ukraine in the Gogino district of the Kharkov region.
In the very ring there are battles for the liberation of the village of
Malaya Volchya. Since the beginning of the month, according to
the Ministry of Defense, more than 600 militants, 15 armoured
combat vehicles, 9 cars, 13 ATVs and 23 ground-based
robotic systems - have been destroyed in the ring.
Roundabout: how ----- the Russian army
will eliminate the Volchansky cauldron
Of the 1.7 thousand surrounded soldiers of the Ukrainian
Armed Forces, just over a thousand remain in service
— official Kyiv still ignores the situation.
____________________________________________
MEP Sypnevsky called for
---- an endto funding Kyiv
September 16th, 8:35pm
(RT.ru)
Ukraine, glorifying war criminals, should not receive a cent.
This was stated by Member of the European Parliament
from Poland, Marcin Sypniewski.
According to him, which he cites in RIA Novosti, we are talking
about criminals, through whose fault - more than one hundred
thousand Poles died.
«Mostly unarmed civilians — women, small children and old
people; people who were exterminated with unimaginable
cruelty just because they were Poles», Sypniewski said.
Earlier it was reported about Polish MEP Grzegorz Braun,
Similarly to the ABM Treaty, the US unilaterally pulled
out of the INF Treaty in 2019. However, instead of
simply stating it wished to develop weapons
beyond the treaty’s limitations, the Trump
administration accused Moscow of
violating the treaty by lying about
the range of its 9M728/9M729
missiles used by Iskander
missile systems.
Nonetheless, within 2 weeks of the US’ formal
departure from the treaty, in August 2019, it
began testing the first of multiple missiles
that violated the treaty’s limitations.
The origins of the INF Treaty lay in a dramatic
showdown, across Europe, in late 1983,
triggered by Washington’s deployment
of ITS Pershing-II intermediate-range
ballistic missiles (IRBM) to Europe.
With a 900-mile range, a flight apogee of just 60 miles,
and a maneuverable, radar-guided reentry vehicle,
the missile could put an 80-kiloton nuclear war-
head on Moscow in between 6 and 11 minutes
...according to Pentagon leaders. Such a fast
strike time gave the Soviets just minutes to
identify, analyze and respond to the threat,
greatly increasing the risk of them mis-
reading a situation and launching a
mistaken nuclear return volley,
believing it to be their
only chance.
In addition, tensions in Europe had already been
ramped up by years of psychological operations
designed to increase Soviet anxieties, such as
US bombers charging Soviet borders and
turning away at the last second
That’s why, when NATO began the vast, ultra-realistic
“Able Archer-83” war games, simulating an all-out
attack on the Soviet Union, in November 1983, it put Soviet fears through the roof.
However, it wasn’t until after the war games had
concluded, several days later, that NATO
commanders discovered key signs: the
Soviets had loaded hundreds of strike
aircraft in East Germany and Poland
with nuclear bombs, and orders to
strike “front-line targets” at a
moment’s notice.
The INF Treaty eliminated missiles like the Pershing-II,
banning land-based missiles with ranges of between
500 klms and 5,500 klms. This significantly cooled
tensions in Europe... although the treaty was only
between the US and Soviet Union -- now Russia --
which left other countries, such as China, free to
develop their own intermediate-range missiles.
The INF’s absence now is especially poignant,
considering the long-standing Russian fears
over a NATO Aegis Ashore missile system,
built on a land base in Deveselu, Romania.
While the US claimed the system was purely
defensive, Moscow noted... that Aegis can
also be used to launch offensive missiles.
Among the missiles tested after the INF Treaty lapsed
was a land-based Tomahawk missile with a range of
1,600 kilometres - a cruise missile US Aegis
cruisers have fired at sea for years.
1992 Treaty on Open Skies
The Open Skies treaty... was an attempt to increase
transparency and put to rest fears of an impending
attack by the other side. The deal allowed 35
partner nations to perform reconnaissance
overflights over other nations... using
specialized aircraft with specialized
equipment. However, flights could
not interfere with other military
activities and could be refused
by the overflown nation, for a
variety of reasons.
The US sent signs it was interested in leaving the
treaty as early as 2019, claiming it was caused
by Russia refusing US Open Skies aircraft
access to several areas almost a decade
earlier - denials Moscow insisted were
within its rights under the treaty.
The US finally made the move on May 21ST 2020,
meaning the six-month cooldown time had the
US leaving the treaty, after the November 2020 elections, that Trump lost.
The decision sparked an outcry across Europe, with Ukraine being one of the loudest critics;
that nation having long used Open Skies to perform overflights in western Russia, to calm its nerves about troops and
installations there.
Indeed, the Open Skies Treaty was drafted precisely to
avoid the type of anxious confrontation... unfolding on
the Russia-Ukraine border, over the last two months.
The Democrats publicly attacked Trump’s withdrawal
as illegal then... although much of their criticism
focused on his refusal to notify Congress before
pulling out. However, in March 2021, a leaked
message --- sent to concerned “international
partners” by the Biden administration said
it was afraid that doing so “would send
the wrong message to Russia and
undermine our position... on the
broader arms control agenda.”
Istanbul, Astana Declarations
The Organization for Security and Cooperation in
Europe (OSCE) has its origins in the November
1972 multilateral talks in Espoo, Finland
...intended to further the peaceful
cooperation of the Detente era.
Today, the OSCE has 57 members and 11 observers
and continues to serve as a regional forum for
resolving international issues.
Two of its most important declarations of principles
came at summits in Istanbul, Turkey, in 1999 and in
Astana (now Nur-Sultan), Kazakhstan, in 2010,
which, among other topics, affirmed each
nation’s right to its own security in the
context of an international community.
"The security of each participating State... is
inseparably linked to that of all others. Each
participating State, has an equal right to
security. We reaffirm the inherent right
of each and every participating State
...to be free to choose or change its
security arrangements, including
treaties of alliance, as they evolve.''
''Each State also has the right to neutrality. Each
participating State will respect the rights of all others in these regards. They will not
strengthen their security ...at the
expense of... the security of
other States.'' the Astana
declaration states.
While the OSCE met in Vienna, Austria, 2 weeks ago,
the talks yielded no major breakthrough. Earlier this
week -- when the US and NATO delivered separate
written responses to Russia’s December security
proposal -- the US response was considerably
more intransigent, while NATO’s, sent from
Brussels and speaking for 30 member
states, acknowledged the Russian
security concerns and proposed
mutual briefings in the NATO-
Russia Council and the re-
establishment of their
respective envoys in
Moscow & Brussels.
However, neither reply gave deference to Russia’s
central concern --- the eastward expansion of
NATO and the impact that has on Russian
security, especially since now, the US
explicitly regards Russia as a
challenger to its position ...as leader of the post- Cold War global order.
Speaking on Thursday, about the US response,
in particular, Russia's Foreign Minister, Sergey
Lavrov said "The principle that one should not strengthen one's security -- at the expense of
the security of others is deliberately avoided.
Neither the Istanbul or Astana declarations are mentioned by our Western partners in the discussions on European
security that are currently
taking place. We cannot
accept this.”
Morgan Artyukhina is a writer and news editor at
Sputnik’s Washington, DC, bureau... focusing on
international & breaking news. Born in southern Maryland, she studied Russian, Central, and
East European Studies, at the University of
Glasgow and is a former history professor.
At Sputnik, she covers military technology,
the expanding neoliberal police state, and
the ongoing struggles against it in the US
and around the globe.
Paul Larudee: Zionist Dream
Turning into Nightmare
November 25th, 5:26pm (FNA)
Paul Larudee, political activist and commentator,
says Zionists have come to this understating
- that Zionism is now nearing its predestined
self-annihilation.
Speaking in an interview with FNA, Larudee
said, “Zionism planted the seeds of its own
destruction the moment they created a
plan for a Jewish state in someone
else's homeland. It is increasingly
becoming an international pariah
...contributing to the wars and
conflicts in West Asia, South
America, Africa, and other
parts of the world. It only
creates more enemies
for them.”
Paul Larudee is an - Iranian-born - American political
activist who is a major figure in the pro-Palestinian
movement. Based in the San Francisco Bay area,
he is involved with the International Solidarity
Movement, & was a founder of the Free Gaza
Movement & the Free Palestine Movement.
Larudee was a member of the US delegation
aboard the 2010 Gaza Freedom Flotilla,
which was attacked by Israeli forces.
Below is the full text of the interview:
Q: Yaakov Sharett says “Israel and the Zionist
enterprise were born in sin.” What do we
learn about the nature of Israel?
A: Such words from a Zionist leader's son may help to
gradually sink doubts into the minds of other Zionists,
but we must not forget that many Jews were opposed
to Zionism for decades before 1948. It is unfortunate
that as Zionism became more successful in its
genocidal project, it also became more
acceptable to more Jews. But that is
now being reversed. As Zionism
becomes more racist, violent,
and aggressive, it is starting
to lose Jews who cannot
stomach such behaviour.
Q: Such a significant assertion was made by the son
of a signatory to the Israeli declaration in 1948. Do
you believe settlers will learn a lesson to end their
occupation of the Palestinians’ land?
A: There are two kinds of settlers that are being used
to colonize the West Bank and Jerusalem. The most
aggressive and violent are the ideological settlers,
who think of themselves as conquering soldiers,
much like the Europeans who took the land from
the native peoples in the western hemisphere.
They want to expel all Palestinians by any means
necessary, and take their land. They do not need
Israel to paint a rosy picture. They are ready to
endure hardship, although Israel actually
helps and enables them. The other type
are the opportunists. Israel builds
subsidized housing and industrial
parks on Palestinian land... and
makes it attractive for settlers
to move there. Israel creates
many advantages for them...
so as to increase the Jewish
population in the occupied
territories and push the
Palestinians out.
Q: Yaakov Sharett predicts a dark future for Israel
and asks settlers to immigrate from Israel; like-
wise, Lawrence Wilkerson, former Israeli State
Department aide, said Israel will be gone in
some 20 years. How do you assess
these statements?
A: Clearly, Sharett is being a realist in this case.
Despite Israel's influence, propaganda, bribes
and manipulations of other governments, it is
increasingly becoming an international pariah,
contributing to the wars and conflicts in West
Asia, South America, Africa and other parts of
the world. They believe that this makes them
strong, but it only creates more enemies for
them. Sharett seems to understand that the
Zionist dream is proving to be unsustainable.
It can only be realized by committing greater
and greater crimes, but even many Zionists
consider this too high a price for their dream,
and their dream is turning into a nightmare.
Zionism planted the seeds of its own destruction
the moment they created a plan for a Jewish
state on someone else's homeland.
UN Must Prevent Normalization of
Israeli Violation of Human Rights:
Iran Envoy
November 20th, 11am (al Manar)
Iran’s ambassador to the UN office in Geneva
put the onus on the United Nations: to take
action: against the normalization of the
systematic violation of human rights
and humanitarian laws, by the
Zionist regime.
In an address to a meeting between ambassadors
of the member states of the Organization of
Islamic Cooperation, residing in Geneva,
and to members of the Commission of Inquiry of the UN Council on Human
Rights, held on Friday, Esmaeil
Baqaei Hamaneh called for the
clarification of true and false
narratives, referring to the
stories... that equate the
victims of Israeli crimes
with the perpetrators
of the heinous acts.
“It is the duty of all of us to clarify the true and false
narratives, the narrative that equates the victims
of Israeli crimes, with their killers, which is
humanly shocking, legally unfounded,
and morally shameful,” the Iranian
envoy stressed.
He added that the inquiry commission has an historic
responsibility --- to prevent the normalization of
systematic human rights violations by the
Israeli regime.
The Iranian diplomat invited all the participants in the
meeting to call for justice; and not allow war crimes,
crimes against humanity, and blatant violations of
human rights, to become normal, Press
TV reported.
In May, the UN Human Rights Council agreed to initiate
an international probe into “systematic” human rights
abuses committed during the asymmetrical war
between ‘Israel’ and Palestinian resistance
groups in the besieged Gaza Strip.
The 47-member forum adopted a resolution presented
by Pakistan on behalf of the OIC and the Palestinian
delegation to the UN, by a vote of 24 states in favour, 9 against, and 14 abstentions.
The UN rights body agreed to establish “an ongoing
independent, international commission of inquiry”
into the war to probe the “underlying root causes
of recurrent tensions and instability, including
the systematic discrimination and repression
based on group identity.”
Israeli troops have, on numerous occasions, been
caught on camera, brutally killing Palestinians...
with the videos going viral online and sparking
international condemnation.
The Tel Aviv regime has been criticized for its extensive
use of lethal force against, and extrajudicial killing of,
Palestinians... who do not pose an immediate threat
to the occupation forces, or to the Israeli settlers.
In a statement released on Tuesday, the Palestinian
Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates, called
on the International Criminal Court to launch an
immediate investigation into the Tel Aviv
regime’s crimes, in the occupied
Palestinian territories --- after
the Israeli forces shot dead a
young man, in the northern
part of the West Bank.
Source: Iranian Agencies
China is no threat
to people in the US; Wall Street,CIA & the Pentagon are
-- Analyst
October 16th, 3:14pm (PressTV)
US political analyst and activist Bill Dores says
China is no threat to the people in the US., but
Wall Street, the CIA, and the Pentagon, are.
Dores, a writer for Struggle/La Lucha and a longtime
antiwar activist, made the remarks in an interview
with Press TV on Saturday, after the CIA launched
a new mission centre to address what it calls “the most important geopolitical threat” posed... by China.
CIA Director William Burns said in a statement last week
that the new unit, called the China Mission Centre, will
“further strengthen our collective work on the most
important geopolitical threat we face in the 21st
century, an increasingly adversarial Chinese
government.”
Burns said that his agency will still focus on other threats
as well, including those emanating from Russia, North
Korea and Iran.
The CIA’s renewed attention to China is the latest evidence
of the Biden administration’s focus on Beijing as its main
foreign policy target.
Since taking charge of the White House earlier this year,
the Biden administration has been directing resources
toward countering China.
Why is the CIA targeting China?
“The CIA is grabbing more tax money --- to start a ‘mission
centre’ aimed at China, which it calls the ‘most important
geopolitical threat we face.’ This is ominous news
- considering the agency’s history of 'fabricating'
evidence to start wars, e.g. Iraq’s nonexistent
‘weapons of mass destruction,’” Dores
commented to Press TV.
“US troops have left Afghanistan. But not a dime has been
slashed from the bloated US military budget. Indeed, it’s
being increased to $778 billion from $753 billion to face
the alleged ‘Chinese threat.’ That’s more than the
combined military budgets of China, India,
Russia, Britain, Saudi Arabia, Germany,
France, Japan, South Korea, Italy
and Australia,” he added.
“It’s also been revealed that US Special Forces have been
operating secretly on Taiwan for two years. Meanwhile...
the US Congress will not pass the Build Back Better Act
to modestly extend our social safety net,” he added.
“The People’s Republic of China... has five times the population of the United States. But it spends only
$258 billion on its military. China’s forces are
deployed in - or around - the borders and
coasts of China. By no stretch of the
imagination is China threatening
he US militarily. Why would it?
For what gain?” he asked.
“So, what the Sam Hill is a ‘geopolitical threat.’ It’s a
twisted concept based on the twisted premise that
the United States, with 4 percent of the world’s
population, should dominate the world
politically & economically. And that
really means the billionaires and
millionaires, that Occupy Wall
Street protesters called the
‘One Percent,’” he stated.
China’s economic ‘threat’ to US
“China’s real ‘threat,’ in the minds of the US corporate
ruling class, is economic. China produces more than
the United States, and its economy is growing much faster,” the analyst said.
“It has achieved this, not by destroying the economies of
other countries with war and sanctions, but by growth,
and trade. China’s Belt and Road Initiative has greatly
weakened the stranglehold Wall Street banks once
held on the world economy. An article in the US
magazine Foreign Policy whined: that China is
‘whittling away’ at the murderous ‘sanctions
regime’ the US and West Europe use -- to
‘punish’ countries that defy their
dictates,” he explained.
“US corporations do, of course, invest in China. They make
a lot of money there. But they cannot dictate to China's
government the way US oil companies dictated to the
Shah of Iran before the 1979 Islamic Revolution. Or
the way they dictate to their paid servants in the
White House and the Capitol today,”
he observed.
“Politicians and news media tell working-class people in
the US that China’s growth is, somehow, a threat to our
well-being. They conceal the fact: that China’s dynamic
growth is the biggest single factor staving off a global
economic collapse,” he said.
“Yet it is their own Wall Street masters who have shut
down plants all over this country and foreclosed on
millions of homes. It is they who used the techno-
logical revolution as a weapon, to drive down
wages and destroy millions of jobs,”
Dores said.
Washington’s ‘hate China’ campaign
“Washington raises several phony issues in its ‘hate
China’ campaign. One is the alleged persecution of
the Uighur people in Xinjiang Province. There’s
nothing but hypocrisy here,” the analyst said.
“If this claim were true - and I’ve seen no reliable evidence
that it is - Washington would be the last to care. The US
leads the world in mass incarceration and murder
by police,” he noted.
“According to the Equal Justice Initiative... ‘Millions of
Americans are incarcerated in overcrowded, violent,
and inhumane jails and prisons.. that do not provide
treatment, education, or rehabilitation.' A majority
are from the oppressed Black, Latin and Native
nations... targeted by the police,” he said.
“Among the incarcerated are dozens of political
prisoners, such as Mumia Abu Jamal, Leonard
Peltier and Jamil Abdullah Al Amin, who have
spent decades behind bars on framed-up
charges,” he stated.
“Last year’s Black Lives Matter uprising..... highlighted
the extent of racist police murder in the US. Between
1980 and 2018, the US police killed more than 30,000
people. Half of those killings were misclassified,
according to a study published in the Lancet
medical journal,” he said.
US supports ‘ethnic cleansing and
murder of Palestinian people’
“We also can't forget that Washington not only supports
but subsidizes --- the ethnic cleansing and murder of
Palestinian people --- by the racist state of Israel,
including the mass imprisonment of 2 million
people in the giant concentration camp
called the Gaza Strip. The US also has
no problem with the oppression of
the majority Muslim people of
Kashmir, by the Indian state,” Dores noted.
“The US accuses China of stealing ‘intellectual property,’
a twisted concept indeed. Perhaps the West should pay
China for inventing paper, iron smelting, the seed drill,
the compass, rockets, gunpowder and other
innovations... that made its economic
development possible,” he said.
“There is the accusation of currency manipulation. But
Washington... has flooded the world with devalued
dollars ever since the Nixon administration took
the dollar off the gold standard in the 1970s.
The US has long used the dollar as an
instrument of financial warfare,”
he said.
Why is the US Navy in the South China Sea?
“And there is the issue of ‘free navigation’ in the South
China Sea. Which raises the question, what is the US
Seventh Fleet doing in the South China Sea anyway?
For that matter, why is the US Fifth Fleet off the
coast of Iran and the US Fourth Fleet off the
coast of Venezuela,” Dores said.
“Every year, ships carry $3.4 trillion worth of goods
through the South China Sea. Most of that is
bound to and from China,” he said.
“The PRC has no interest in stopping that commerce.
It does have an interest in keeping US warships
away from its coast and ports,” he said.
“For the past seven years, the US Navy has helped Saudi
Arabia impose a naval blockade that is starving the
children of Yemen. US sanctions, backed by the
US Navy, are the main obstacle to commerce
between nations in the world today,”
he said.
“Instead of new CIA mission centres, military bases and
fleets of warships and warplanes all over the world, the
US should do what China does: Invest in schools,
health care, housing, railroads and renewable
energy. Bring all the ships, planes, troops
and spies home. The world would be a
much better and safer place,”
he concluded.
Iran won’t let US, Turkey, Israel
create crisis in Caucasus
Sunday, October 3rd, 11:51am (PressTV)
by Sa’dollah Zarei
The fact of the matter is, that if there is no more time for
preventing a conspiracy from taking shape... there is
still time to thwart the conspiracy that has formed.
Here are some points with regards to this issue:
1) What the US, the Zionist regime, the governments of
Turkey and Azerbaijan, and the West in general, are
pursuing in the regions north of Iran is, firstly, a reaction to the great achievements of the
Islamic Republic and the resistance front.
When the criminal Zionist regime refers to the Republic of
Azerbaijan as “Lebanon of Israel,” it means that there is
a “Lebanon of resistance” that has foiled any Israeli
conspiracy over the past forty years and turned
into a major crisis for the occupying regime.
Why is a front led by the US, Zionist regime, Turkey and
Azerbaijan, talking about launching a pan-Turan move
-ment here? Because a powerful religious movement
has, for more than 40 years, disrupted the plots of
colonialists and criminals. So, it is quite clear that the enemy, although very hardworking, is in a state of “passivity.”
Here is another important question: will this evil conspiracy
ever yield any result? The answer is that there is a serious
antidote to prevent the realization of this tension-making
scheme, and if it enters the scene, it will definitely
thwart the plan, as it has happened so far.
2) Some people make a mistake here and say that the Syunik
agreement with North Karabakh... is a matter that concerns
the governments of Azerbaijan and Armenia and that Iran’s
objection to it is not a matter of concern. They argue that
the implementation of the agreement is to the detriment
of Iran’s regional situation, but it is a natural
consequence and thus does not create a
right for Iran to legitimize its opposition.
The answer is clear; This is not an agreement between the
two countries on a disputed region, but one on creating a
region meant to undermine the security, political and
economic position of a third country.
While acknowledging their military and political failure, in
Afghanistan, the Americans explicitly speak of pursuing
a proxy war model to make up for their defeat. Shortly
afterwards, it becomes known that they had sent a
signal to Azerbaijan to launch and attack and a
signal to Armenia to, in turn, show tolerance
and accept the post-war reality, and at the
same time, following the end of a recent
44-day Karabakh war, the US stated
that they 'support' the agreements
reached between Azerbaijan and
Armenia. All this suggests that
the US has been standing behind this war and the situation that ensued.
Simultaneously, the Azerbaijani government announced
the widespread use of Israeli attack drones in the war,
and the Armenian army called the UAVs the main
reason for its heavy casualties in the war. This
means that it was an American-Israeli war.
Everyone knows, that the administration of Armenian
Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan is a Christian govern-
ment dependent on the West, but it's interesting that
in this war, the United States and Israel destroyed the forces and facilities belonging to a pro-West
Christian administration, and supported a
Muslim government instead! Isn’t that
a telltale sign?
The question is, what kind of “proxy war” US officials
were talking about in the course of their withdrawal
from Afghanistan? Was it possible for the US to
start such a war in Afghanistan? Which forces
could be used by the US to launch a proxy war
in Afghanistan? Could the US bring the Taliban
- which was taking power - into a proxy war?
Proxy war with whom? The answer is no.
Was the Afghan army able to enter a proxy war? The
answer's clear. Was the army that was not even able
to defend Kabul for an hour, against the Taliban —
which took control of the capital without firing a
single shot — ready to enter a proxy war?
Could the old mujahedeen forces.. serve
as the proxies of the American war? The
answer is clear. The old forces, besides
having an anti-American spirit... have
currently no military capability. Could
the USA... create a ''proxy force'' in
Afghanistan, in the medium term,
with the Taliban et al present on the scene? The answer to this
question is also, no. This is
because... for at least the
next 50 years... US crimes
will be in front of the eyes
of the Afghan people, and
the prospect for any kind
of Afghan-American,
cooperation...
is bleak.
So, what did the Americans mean by a proxy war? In fact,
the Americans wanted a proxy war where there was a
fertile ground... and the required strength. From the
American point of view, the “ethnicity” factor must
be emphasized and turned into a winning weapon
against anti-American revolutionary uprisings.
The Americans have long focused on the
model of racism and pan-Turanism... in
the case of this region, and considered
them as “a possible solution,” or more
accurately, the last “remaining arrow,”
and pinned their hopes on it.
Therefore, the prominent role of this tendency, in the
developments in the north, and its overlapping in the
Caucasus, besides the intention to highlight the anti
Iranian and anti-Islamic edges in the rhetoric of the
officials of these countries, tell us that we are
facing a “semi-hard” proxy war.
When Azeri President Ilham Aliyev speaks openly in an
interview about the widespread presence of Israeli
forces and equipment in the Caucasus, and the
resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh crisis, he
is, in fact, blowing the lid off a proxy war.
3) Saudi Arabia’s measures are yet another issue that is indicative of the proxy war in the developments
unfolding in Iran’s northwestern frontiers, on
the one side, and its scale, on the other. The
Saudis have explicitly said that they are
working to launch a 24-hour television
network for the Turkish region of the
Caucasus called “Turk national.”
Why is the Saudi regime in the Caucasus trying to launch
such a TV network? The people in this region are neither
Arabs nor Sunnis in order for them to be the audience of
a Sunni Arab country. At the same time, it is obvious that this decision cannot be implemented without the consent and cooperation of the governments in the region.
4) Naturally, on this front, Iran can't remain silent and turn
a blind eye to the dimensions and consequences of the
action that being along its borders; therefore, it has to
react, but what is the due reaction? There is no doubt
that military conflict & dragging Iran into the military
arena is a well-known policy of the American front.
On the other hand... we know that what is intended for the Caucasus region is not even a full-fledged military
war, let alone a regional and multilateral war. We
are thus not talking about a war in the sense
that it is perceived. We are talking about
actions that disturb the peace of this
region and the interests of the
powers around it.
Isn’t it true... that the Azerbaijani government says Israeli
drones and forces have been involved in the recent war
between the Republic of Azerbaijan, and the Republic of
Armenia? Isn’t it true that the Israelis explicitly referred
to the Republic of Azerbaijan... as “Lebanon of Israel”?
Since there are talks about the formation of a definite
security threat against the Islamic Republic, Iran has
the right to dismantle and confront the centre of
conspiracy against itself, without coordination
with any place or individual.
This type of Iranian confrontation is not so incomprehensible
to Zionists. Interestingly, an Israeli institution wrote a few
days ago: “Iran may want to retaliate against Israeli attacks
in Syria in Azerbaijan.” The regime is attacking areas in
Syria under the false pretext that Syria has become a
base for the presence of Iranian military personnel.
The Israeli institute asks what problem would arise
if Iran attacked a base in Azerbaijan, where Israeli
force are possibly present?
Of course, Iran knows very well how to use developments
to the detriment of its enemies. The Islamic Republic will
naturally begin with negotiations, to fraternally resolve
the issue between neighbours on Iran’s northwestern
border. Over the past 2 decades, the United States,
Turkey, and the Zionist regime have faced ultimate
defeat in any sedition that they incited and gotten
out of the situation while fraught with humiliation.
They are inciting sedition while they do not have
the power to tolerate and manage the war. If
these acts of sedition are not put aside, they
will face defeat, thanks to Iran’s measures.
(The views expressed in this article.... do
not necessarily reflect those of Press TV.)
It’s time for NATO to leave Kosovo
before it does any more damage
October 2nd, 10:36am (RT)
By Boris Malagurski, a Serbian Canadian documentary
film director, known for “The Weight of Chains”,
enlisted in the catalogue of the Library of
Congress, whose work has been show- cased on international festivals...
including Raindance in London.
Follow Boris on Twitter @malagurski
Just as it all ended badly for the West’s military interventions
in Vietnam and Afghanistan, so it will in Kosovo. NATO has
overstepped its mandate, overplayed its hand, and
overstayed its welcome.
As the last US military helicopters were leaving Kabul,
Afghanistan, many, including myself, emphasized the
similarities with America’s embarrassment in Saigon,
South Vietnam – but one parallel that few dared to
draw, was with Kosovo.
When I merely asked “Is Kosovo next?” on Twitter, it
sent Albanian media outlets into a frenzy. Kosovo’s
Albanian majority celebrates the NATO troops as
saviours – NATO bombed Serbia, to take away
control of its Southern province of Kosovo in
1999. Since then, NATO has been sponsoring
a nation-building project... that seemed to have culminated in 2008, when Kosovo’s
provisional authorities declared
independence from Serbia.
It wasn’t an ‘end of history’ moment. Serbia and much of
the world didn’t recognize Kosovo as an independent
country, and Kosovo itself remained heavily
dependent on Western aid... and military
support. Most Albanian politicians are
aware of this and they are highly
obedient with regards to NATO,
whose KFOR troops are
‘keeping the peace’
in Kosovo.
However, NATO has overstepped its mandate. UN Security
Council Resolution 1244, which put an end to NATO’s war
with Yugoslavia, guarantees Serbia’s sovereignty over
Kosovo, while NATO has pushed for an independent
Kosovo from day one of their occupation. The
resolution also called for... the return of an
agreed number of Yugoslav and Serbian
personnel to maintain a presence at
significant sites and key border
crossings.... NATO has never
allowed this to happen. The
last Serbian prime minister
who called for this agree-
ment to be honored, was
assassinated in 2003, a little over a month
after his request.
On the other hand, what are the results of NATO’s nation
building in Kosovo? Close to a 30% unemployment rate.
One of the poorest areas of Europe... with as much as
45% of the population living below the official poverty
line, and 17% being extremely poor. Former Kosovo
Liberation Army terrorists, some accused of
trafficking weapons and human organs,
replaced their military uniforms with
politicians’ suits and are governing
the entity. The previous president
of Kosovo, nicknamed ‘The Snake’
...is currently being tried for war
crimes, and crimes against
humanity, at The Hague.
He’s the one who unveiled the Bill Clinton statue in
Kosovo’s capital. Bill then came to celebrate with
‘The Snake’.
Kosovo’s recent license plate row with Serbia was just
the latest example of a leadership in Kosovo incapable
of dealing with real issues, but rather... going into
conflict... to cover its incompetence. Instead of
negotiating with Belgrade, Kosovo unilaterally
used force --- to implement the removal of
Serbian license plates. And all that NATO
was willing to contribute to deescalate
the tensions... was to offer its KFOR
troops, to replace Kosovo’s special
unit, without even trying to resolve
the essence of the dispute. What
is NATO still doing in Kosovo?
Probably the same thing it was doing in Afghanistan.
Hoping a bad decision to go in, will eventually pay
off somehow. But it won’t. It didn’t in Vietnam, it
didn’t in Afghanistan, and it won’t in Kosovo.
So it’s time for NATO to start packing
its bags.
The statements, views and opinions expressed
in this column, are solely those of the author,
& don't, necessarily, represent those of RT.
“Normalization":Betrayal of Palestineby Arab despots no easy road
by Iqbal Jassat
October 1st, 11am (PressTV)
Pinning Palestinians down while applying harsh
measures of violent repression -- accompanied
by a fanatical settler movement of arch-racists
given free reign to attack and plunder -- is a
notorious game Israel has elevated to a
daily ritual.
In fact the routine of inflicting war crimes has all
the hallmarks of a rogue regime entirely caught
up in a misplaced belief --- that to engage in ethnic cleansing, is a religious obligation.
Conflating Judaism with a racist political ideology
of Zionism has been part of a strategy designed
to deceive, distort and divert. It has its roots in
the first Zionist congress held on the eve of
the 19th century.
That this is well documented and widely known is
not in dispute. Indeed... awareness of Zionism's
goal to dismember and dislodge Palestinians
from their centuries old homeland and
forcibly impose thereon a foreign
entity known as Israel, has
always been a bedrock
for resistance.
Israel has thus always been considered an enemy
thrust upon a native population through the most
horrific forms of terrorism. The memories of Deir
Yassin remind the world of bloody massacres
committed by Zionist terrorists which didn't
spare hundreds of villages... to
colonize Palestine.
That more than seven decades later the expansionist
goals of Zionism are still being pursued at great
human cost to successive generations of the
indigenous Palestinian population, is
reflected in daily atrocities.
None of these facts, as attested to by historians, as
well as organs of the United Nations, are contested.
Though of course Israel and supporters of it seek
to distort and malign commentators who speak
truth to power, as anti-Semitic.
Yet against this background of terrorism and current
conditions siege, occupation, killings and mass
imprisonment - recorded and broadcast via
mainstream media for all the world to
witness - it is bizarre that a handful
of Arab regimes, have broken rank
with Palestine's freedom struggle.
And at a time when even Haaretz describes
the atrocities by Israel, as a pogrom:
"Residents of the Palestinian communities in the south-
eastern West Bank have experience of settler attacks
- when they graze their flocks, work their fields, or
even have a picnic on their own land.... But they
cannot recall an attack like the one experienced
Tuesday -- by the small communities of Khirbat
al-Mufkara, al-Rakiz and al-Tuwani. On Simhat
Torah, dozens of young Jews, most of them
masked, conducted what can only be
described as a pogrom."
The treachery associated with what has become known
as "normalization" is an outrageous manifestation of
betrayal and collaboration. Limited to the UAE,
Bahrain, Sudan and Morocco,.. these regimes
have in effect confessed that the protection
of their shaky thrones... counts for more...
than legitimate rights of the Palestinians.
As unelected self-imposed despots fearful of democratic
values, they have bargained that "normalization" with
the usurper of Palestine will "guarantee" safety and
protection for them. In other words, just as Egypt
has done, these oligarchs have outsourced their
intelligence networks and security apparatus to Israel, knowing full well that in doing so, they have abandoned Palestine.
Though the abnormality of the implicit recognition of an
illegal colonial enterprise, has been in sharp contrast
to countless Arab League resolutions... the deal of
"normalization" pushed by Trump and vigorously
backed by the Biden administration... has exposed these leaders - as surrogates of western imperialism.
The case of Bahrain's role in the "Abraham Accords"
reveals the soft underbelly of Arab dictatorships.
Besides being financially dependent on its
neighbours especially the UAE and Saudi
Arabia, Bahrain’s alliance with Israel is
designed to entrench its power and
crush any resistance to author-
itarianism or efforts towards
freedom and democracy.
In 2011, during the onset of the Arab Spring uprisings,
Saudi Arabia sent troops to Bahrain to suppress anti
-government protests. This trend continues today
by Israel --- equally committed to maintaining the
status quo, and preventing the success of any
popular uprisings.
In this context, one may justifiably condemn Bahrain’s gross insensitivity and abject abdication of Palestine's freedom struggle... as treacherous.
Showcasing Israeli war criminal Lapid’s visit to Manama
where he is set to open the embassy flying Israel's flag
is utterly outrageous. This follows the opening of a
Zionist embassy in Abu Dhabi, and will likely be
establishing one in Rabat. Sudan thus far has
reportedly said that it has no plans yet to
open an embassy in Khartoum.
Not surprising therefore that the Arab street across these
capitals have vowed to end "normalization". The iron-
fisted grip held by Arab despots notwithstanding,
human rights movements (many banned and
leaders exiled) have declared their outright
rejection of America's much-vaunted
Abraham Accords.
Stirrings in Sudan are becoming more vocal despite
Khartoum's attempts to silence critics. In Bahrain
the main opposition group, al-Wefaq National
Islamic Society declared Lapid’s trip as a
"threat", saying, "This is provocative
news and this trip is completely
rejected, and he (Lapid) should
not set foot on Bahraini soil."
Their message is clear: "Any (Israeli) presence on Bahraini soil --- means incitement."
Iqbal Jassat is an executive at the Johannesburg-
based Media Review Network (MRN), a socio-
political advocacy group, that concerns
itself with media and political analysis.
(The views expressed in this article do
not necessarily reflect those of Press TV.)
Greece And FranceTake First Step
Towards European Independence
Following AUKUS Debacle
September 28th (South Front)
by Paul Antonopoulos,
independent geopolitical analyst
Signing of Franco-Greek Agreement is the
beginning of supplanting NATO in Europe.
Of the 30 NATO member states, Greece is one of the few
to spend well over 2% of its GDP on defense, as agreed
upon by NATO Defence Ministers, in 2006. However,
Greece’s high spending (relative to GDP), is not
because it is positioning itself as a buffed-up
military state opposed to Russia, as per the
aims of NATO, but rather, to defend itself
against the threats of another NATO
member, Turkey.
With NATO consistently downplaying Turkish aggression
against Greece and the new AUKUS pact creating
distrust between the Anglosphere and the
Europeans... Greece has ensured new
extra security assurances against
its long-time enemy.
Greece’s strengthened partnership with France highlights
that the immediate consequences of the AUKUS alliance
are already being felt, as the two countries are making
the first serious steps towards a Europe independent
of Washington.
Alexis Papahelas, one of Greece’s top journalists, explained
that the Franco-Greek security pact is Macron’s “revenge”
against the Americans as it will strengthen European
autonomy. He also confirmed persistent rumours
that a defensive pact between France and
Greece was almost reached last year,
but ultimately broke down at the
last minute for “unknown
reasons.”
To put the situation in context, Greece for a year and a half-
received bids from six countries, including France, the U.S.
and UK for brand new navy frigates. The finalization of a
deal was continuously delayed... due to Greece’s
insistence, that a frigate purchase must include a defense agreement.
Greece signed its 12-month Mutual Defense Cooperation
Agreement (MDCA) with the US last year, but ultimately
did not decide on which frigate bid to accept. With
negotiations for a Franco-Greek defence pact
last year stalling, Athens ultimately decided
to sign the MDCA... with Washington. This
was rumored to be partially motivated
as part of 'negotiations' to pressure
the French to accept Greek terms.
However, with the sudden emergence of AUKUS, European
trust in the Anglosphere quickly diminished, and thus
galvanized Franco-Greek discussions on European
independence. And finally, a deal to purchase
three brand-new French Belharra-class
frigates, was stricken.
For his part, Mitsotakis said on Tuesday morning at the
signing of the agreement that:- “It is an historic day for Greece and France. Today’s development is an
initiative that responds to the demands of the
times on our continent. It paves the way for
an autonomous and strong Europe of the
future. Whether there is a timetable for
creating a European army: the debate
on European military autonomy,
evolves. Options such as this
corporate defense partner-
ship, move to this central
strategic choice.”
Effectively, Greece and France are advocating for a pan-
European military that would likely drive out NATO, as
the premier defensive pact in Europe.
Another demonstration that this pact is aimed at
supplanting NATO... is its careful wording.
Although Turkey was not mentioned
explicitly, there is little doubt that
part of the motivation for the
Franco-Greek defense pact
was Turkey’s unilateral
aggression in the
Mediterranean.
Even just minutes after the signing of the Franco-Greek
agreement, former Dutch diplomat Fons Stoelinga
tweeted: “EU autonomy in security and defense.
NATO still does not address the problem of
NATO-member Turkey destabilizing the
whole Eastern Mediterranean region.
France and Greece now react and
signed a security bilateral pact.”
The mutual defense assistance clause of the agreement
ensures that if Greece or France is attacked on its
territory, the other will come to assist, even if the
attacking country is part of other alliances.....
including NATO. This is an obvious message
directed towards Turkey, a NATO member
that on a daily basis violates Greek air-
space and threatens to invade its
Aegean islands.
These violations and threats receive no repercussions from
NATO as individual members are unwilling to risk their
economic relations with the country, whilst many
NATO leaders still believe that Turkey is a
bulwark against Russia.
France for most of its modern history, but especially
galvanized under President Emmanuel Macron.. had
an ambition of creating a more independent Europe.
The European experience under former U.S.
President, Donald Trump, and the recent
snub from President Joe Biden, with the
AUKUS debacle... has only increased the urgency of achieving European
independence from Washington.
Despite this ambition, as well as warning Europe that it will
become secondary in world affairs, if it does not become
independent, it appears that France can finally kickstart
its project alongside Greece.
Achieving EU unity is a difficult prospect, because minnow
states like Lithuania prioritize the interests of Washington
rather than the continent, but as Paris and Athens have
shown --- they will move ahead, in changing the geo-
political balance in the Mediterranean and will not
wait, while member states continuously bicker
amongst themselves on foreign policy issues.
If France and Greece can create strong foundations for an
independent Europe, it will only be inevitable before more
EU member states become interested in also being
integrated into a continental structure that is
independent of transatlantic alliances.
Why did the Taliban win against
the Americans in Afghanistan?
by Eric Zuesse
August 21st, 2021
Why did the communists win
against the Americans in Vietnam?
Why did the communists win
against the capitalists in the
Russian Revolution?
Why did the American Revolutionists
win against the British Empire?
I shall here propose an answer to all of them, because that answer applies to all such cases, as I'll explain:
When an imperialistic society is as corrupt as Britain has been since the creation of the British East India Company in 1600, and as America has been since the end of World War II in 1945, with its takeover and control by the MIC (military-industrial complex), which has inevitably produced the cancerous growth of America’s permanent-warfare state, what, then, is the reason to continue living by staying merely as a colonist or a vassal-regime (or even as the imperialist regime itself), which means, when the imposed regime is so profoundly corrupt --- as any
imperialist power necessarily is --- to accept such corruption, as this?
There’s something that is worse than dying... and it is to continue
living under a regime that one utterly despises. That’s a dragged
-out death, instead of a quick death. A regime which is as
corrupt as any imperialistic regime inevitably is, will be
intolerable for a significant number of the residents in
any one of its vassal-nations or “colonies.” Death, for
them, isn’t such a bad choice, if it means that they'll
go down fighting to overthrow it. They are driven by
the motivation, “Give me liberty, or give me death!”
This is a motivation that few, if any, of the imperialistic regime’s hired
soldiers (regardless of whether conscripted or not) can match. And
when they are foreigners who are fighting on a foreign soil (instead
of locals who are defending their land’s own locally determined
rulers), they especially and certainly cannot match such
motivation, because only the locals can be fighting with
a patriotic spirit. This is an intrinsic weakness in any
empire. And imperialist leaders tend to ignore it,
because they don’t want to understand how
repulsive they are, to virtually anyone but
their own boot-lickers.
Ultimately, the demoralization of a hired soldier’s continuing to place
his very existence in jeopardy so as to continue the war to enslave
and control the resisting local subject-population will mount high
enough to produce self-contempt, desertion, and sometimes
even suicide, in the oppressing power’s forces, especially if that’s a foreign power.
No longer will the rationalizations(that “We are protecting the residents here”) be able to continue fooling the invading-force’s soldier, and the imposed stooge- regime’s soldier. They both (the foreign regime, and its imposed local stooge-government or colony) are there really, to control the local subject-population; and, ultimately, enough of the oppressor’s forces will know this to cause the imposed stooge-government, to be conquered by those indigenous residents there - people who will be recalled as heroes, by the other
residents in that land.
This is an advantage that any revolutionists
have, against the imposed regime.
This is the real meaning of “martyrs,” in the deeper sense than
merely of a religious type — it is instead of the patriotic type; it
concerns the land -- and not necessarily any religion -- such as
Christianity, Islam, or Marxism. Their loyalty is to Afghanistan;
or it is to Vietnam; or it is to Russia; or it is to China; or (before
America became imperialistic) it was to America. And so forth.
It is to the local land, not to any dictators. It is to the country
that the foreign invader’s forces are occupying. The
invader’s forces and their imposed stooge-regimes
can’t match this motivation.
Similarly, when the American invaders were conquered by the
residents of Vietnam, the winners were the Vietnamese, not
really the communists; and, in fact, the Marxist philosophy
(or ‘religion’) subsequently has waned there. America, in
Vietnam, as in Afghanistan, was the invader, in a land
which had not invaded their own.
That similar situation exists in Afghanistan. The Sauds had invaded
America on 9/11, with the assistance of G.W. Bush, Condoleezza
Rice, and perhaps others in the Administration. And so, the U.S.
-imposed soldiers in Afghanistan couldn’t even possibly have
been fighting against Afghanistan for any authentically
patriotic real (factually true) reason, at all. Therefore,
lies were constantly needed by the U.S. regime, not
only against Iraq, but even against Afghanistan.
(Furthermore, if Bush’s objective had really been to identify whom
and how was actually behind the 9/11 attacks, then he would have
pursued that at the U.N. Security Council and would have gotten
unanimous backing for it, which would quickly have isolated
and led to the destruction of Al Qaeda. It could all have been
done without any war between nations, and also fully in
accord with international law. To the extent that 9/11 was state-sponsored terrorism, it was actually being
sponsored by the Governments of the U.S. and
Saudi Arabia.
George W. Bush, who was buddy-close with the Sauds, used 9/11 as
an excuse to trash both the U.S. Constitution and international law
so as to hoist yet higher his own tyranny, his own power - not only internationally but also.. in his own nation. An imperialist would,
of course, like to trash both, and to hoist his personal power as
high as possible. And GWB had the boldness to do it, and -
because America has been imperialistic ever since 1945
(i.e., international aggressions... have been America’s
culture since 1945) — he has been able to enjoy the
success of getting away with doing it. However,
everyone else, and especially outside America’s MIC, suffers from it.
What have the mere soldiers of invading and occupying
imperialist powers actually earned by having placed
their own lives at risk? Maybe a tombstone back
home, in the country that had invaded and
occupied that colony.
By contrast, even if a defending soldier has died as a
hero among the locals in a failed revolution against
the imperialist power, any tombstone will be
unnecessary to be that person’s memorial,
because the true memorial is in the heart,
and in the mind, of the locals there, not
in anything that is in the land of the
invading foreign power.
And, so, I propose that the answer, to the question here, is that,
whereas America’s Founders were waging war as heroes
(because their war was just), today’s Americans are
waging war as villains (because our wars are unjust
- imperialistic aggressions, instead of heroic
defenses against an aggressor). Between
America’s founding and the present time,
America has switched from doing war
against military occupiers, to doing
war as military occupiers.
And this, I maintain, is the reason why: “The Taliban’s 80,000
troops have retaken Afghanistan with cities falling like
dominos while the 300,000-strong government forces,
better equipped and trained, mostly melted and
surrendered with no will to fight.”
What today’s Taliban are to today’s Afghanistan is therefore what
the 1776 American Revolutionists were to the America of that era.
It’s not the ideology; it is the love of that land there, which has
motivated the residents’ forces to victory, against the forces
of the invading-and-occupying foreign power. This can
happen in any land, at any time.
America went into Vietnam focused on the “body counts.” That’s
how stupid America’s imperialistic leaders were, back then. The
only motivation they really understood was fear: “body counts.”
They’ve evidently learned nothing since. That is how corrupt
America is.
Right now in America, the ‘debate’ about Afghanistan is about Joe
Biden, who is basically irrelevant. He wanted to end America’s
military occupation there, just as Trump did, and just as
Obama did. He acted on it, whereas they did not — they
didn’t want to be accused by their political opponents
of having ‘lost Afghanistan on their watch’, but Biden
was evidently willing to risk it.
His only failure in the matter is that he kept lying to the American
people (and probably also to himself) about how chaotic the
evacuation would inevitably be, and about how collapsed
Afghanistan is, and has been, ever since the Soviets
invaded there in 1979.
Throughout America’s imperialistic era, the U.S. Government has
routinely been lying to the American people. Imperialism isn’t as
bad for the imperialistic nation’s public as it is for the conquered
land’s people, but it is very bad, even for them. The only people
who benefit from it are the billionaires, who control companies
such as Lockheed Martin, and ExxonMobil, and Amazon.
Those are the people (the owners), who hire the leading
politicians, including the members of Congress, and the
Presidents, to spread their empire, and their control.
They also hire the ‘journalists’ who shape their nation’s public
to support these invasions and military occupations. The
Government officials of an imperialistic regime represent
not the nation’s public - but its aristocracy - who hire and
appoint millions of the rest, the many agents (employees,
etc.) of the few billionaires. The billionaires really control
their country. After all: America is a thoroughly corrupt
country, just as any imperialistic country is. (All
imperialistic countries, are controlled by their
aristocracy. And every aristocracy is corrupt.)
The public in Afghanistan have long known this fact about America -
that it is corrupt. And this is the main reason why the Taliban now
rule that country. They represent that land. Not this land. It’s a
different culture, and a different place. To most Afghans,
America represents only corruption. There is nothing
unique about what is now happening in Afghanistan.
It has been happening for thousands of years, and
it’s just replaying an ancient script, but in that
particular location.
However, instead, the U.S.-and-allied media are focusing on Biden’s
bit part (which was always in a supporting role) in America’s
invasion and occupation of Afghanistan. So, probably
nothing will be learned from America’s invasion and
occupation of Afghanistan, just as nothing was
learned from America’s invasion & occupation
of Iraq, and from America’s invasion and
occupation of Vietnam, and from the
many other such post-WW-II
American foreign disasters.
For America’s billionaires, these have all been great successes
(very profitable); and, so, probably nothing that’s useful to the
American people will be learned from history; and, instead,
the myths will continue that have caused “The Military” to
be either the highest-respected or the second-highest-
respected of all of the 19 named institutions in America - the world’s permanent- warfare state.
The American military wastes the most money and the most blood
of any institution in America, but Americans nonetheless respect it
enormously. That, too, is a mark of an imperialistic country. The
way to control a public is to sustain the myths. U.S.-and-allied
billionaires make sure that it is done - however much it costs.
As regards the future of Afghanistan itself: On August the 19th,
the most reliable geostrategic reporter and analyst, Alexander
Mercouris, headlined at The Duran, “US Freezes Afghanistan
Reserves, Threatens Economic Crisis. Russia Works to
Establish New Government”, and he explained why the
Taliban will either cooperate with Russia, China, and
Iran, or else will degenerate yet further into a failed
state, especially because the U.S. and its allies will
do everything possible to strangle the fully looted
Government of Afghanistan — the new Islamic
Emirate of Afghanistan. So: even after the US
and its allies have all left that land, the war
against the people there will continue, in
full force, from the same people, though
with different methods.
PS: The philosopher Zizek headlined at RT on August 20th, “The
true enemy for Islamists is not the West’s neocolonialism or
military aggression, but our ‘immoral’ culture”, and he said
“it was not neocons who boosted Islamic fundamentalism,
this fundamentalism grew up in a reaction to the influence
of Western liberal secularism and individualism.”
He did not understand that though religious fundamentalists
(including the Taliban) focus especially on sexual and gender
issues, a person didn’t have to be at all religious in order to
consider the financial and economic corruption of the
imperialists and of their stooges to be disgusting.
Americans didn’t invade & occupy Afghanistan, in order to
spread “liberal secularism and individualism,” but in order
for US-and-allied billionaires to expand their wealth, their
empire, and their global control. Even if the Taliban and
other religious persons might object only (or even just
mainly) to the sexual and gender issues... a broader
segment of the Afghan population were repelled by
the rampant financial and economic corruption of
the imperialists, and of their stooge-rulers.
This was not a defeat for “secularism and individualism.”
It was a rejection of imperialism: a rejection of it even by people who don’t understand what “imperialism” means.
(Source: Strategic Culture Foundation)
Israel is committed to
aggressively pursuing
'Zionist colonialism',
says analyst
August 14th, 9:38am (PressTV)
A political commentator says Israel is relentlessly
following its "Zionist colonialism" in the occupied
Palestinian territories, and the evacuation orders
handed out to indigenous Palestinian families in the West Bank and Jerusalem al-Quds, are in line with the regime’s land
expropriation policies: to build more illegal settler homes.
“Israel aggressively pursues Zionist colonialism, which
has been the bedrock of the regime’s illegal ethnic-
cleansing agenda for the last seventy or more
years,” Iqbal Jassat, an executive member
of Johannesburg-based Media Review
Network, told Press TV, in an
exclusive interview
on Saturday.
He lambasted the Tel Aviv regime’s systematic theft of
Palestinian property as “a reprehensible disregard
for the inalienable rights of indigenous
Palestinians to their own lands
and homes.”
“The racist practice of evacuation, is a misleading
interpretation of forced expulsion, illegal under
the international law. It is also indicative of
the Group Areas Act [of 1950], under the
former apartheid regime of South
Africa,” Jassat noted.
The South African analyst also criticized the United Nations
and the International Criminal Court (ICC), for their
“impotence” ...to prevent Israel's unjust and
blatant violations of international
conventions and principles.
“It also raises serious questions about the inherent biases
existing within these institutions. These biases prevent
the exercise of law --- to halt land grabs, home demolitions, expulsions and incremental genocide,” he pointed out.
Jassat went on to say that Western countries’ decades-long
guilty conscience has prevented these states from
criticizing Israel, for its barbaric and brutal
practices, as such denunciations would
be treated as anti-Semitic.
“The US and its allies in NATO view Israel as a bulwark of
their interests in the heart of the Muslim world. They,
therefore, place their so-called security goals
above injustices against Palestinians,”
the analyst said.
“Moreover, the Arab world is mainly made up of unelected
despots, from Egypt to Saudi Arabia, the United Arab
Emirates and Bahrain. Their collective view, pivots
on the false notion... that their security is tied
to Israel. That explains the close proximity
between their notorious intelligence
services and Israel's Mossad
and Shin Bet.”
Jassat further noted that the controversial normalization
agreements that several Arab states have struck with Israel, have stifled opposition to the Tel Aviv regime’s colonialist and expansionist policies.
He said the unacceptable betrayal of the Palestinians'
struggle for liberation from the Israeli occupation,
has even resulted in the regime being granted
observer status, at the African Union.
Russia-Chinathe Endgame
by Finian Cunningham
July 3rd, 1:41pm (Sputnik)
The consolidation of the Russia-China alliance this week
spells the endgame for Western imperialism and the
never-ending wars that it spawns.
Russia’s President Vladimir Putin and China’s leader Xi
Jinping celebrated the 20th anniversary of the Sino-
Russian Treaty of Friendship, first signed in July
2001. The hallmark of that historic accord is a
mutual commitment to peace, prosperity
and global stability.
As Putin commented, the alliance between Russia and China
is a vital source of “stability at a time of increasing geo-
political turbulence”. The latter remark is an oblique
reference to the US-led Western states which are
driven by ratcheting up antagonism and
tensions with Moscow and Beijing,
using all sorts of spurious
complaints.
The attempt by Washington (whether Republican or Democrat)
and its Western minions to make trouble with Russia and
China has become almost frenetic. Step back from the
daily headlines in Western media and it is glaring just
how much the agenda has become irrationally
hostile towards Moscow and Beijing.
Week after week there are unfounded allegations about
Covid-19, & so on. It’s like a mad cacophony to wind
up tensions. Nevertheless, the deranged attitude of
Western ruling cliques is but the death throes of a
world order that has reached its expiration.
Russia and China’s partnership has hugely transformative
geopolitical significance. Both these giant nations straddle
the continents of Asia and Europe, connecting the Pacific
with the Atlantic, ranging from the Arctic to the
Mediterranean. Both are committed to a vision
of a multipolar world where nations cooperate
for mutual development.
China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) linking Eurasia with
Africa and the Americas is the vision of the future, and
Russia is a key partner in implementing that
ambitious win-win project for global peace
and prosperity.
This vision stands in stark contrast to the prevailing Western
capitalist paradigm which operates through dominance,
control and exploitation for American and European
profiteering. That kind of centuries-old system
necessarily involves imperialist conduct ...
whereby the natural resources of foreign
nations are commandeered by brute
military force, conflict, subjugation,
subterfuge, skulduggery and
other machinations.
The multipolar vision of global relations advocated by Russia
and China is the nemesis of the Western imperialist system.
And that explains why the Americans and their European
vassals make every effort to demonize and distort
Russia and China.
But the geopolitical potential of Russia and China is
unstoppable. There is a force of natural justice that
all nations will inevitably subscribe to as the only
reasonable, feasible & sustainable way forward.
It’s about people-centered development ...
versus profit-driven disorder.
Moreover, the partnership between Russia and China is a
geographer’s wonder study. Russia is the world’s largest
national territory by landmass. With over 17 million sq.
kilometres, it covers 11 time zones out of the world’s
total of 24. The abundance of natural resources that
Russia possesses is astounding, from reserves of
natural gas, oil, metals and minerals, to forestry,
agriculture and fisheries. It also can boast of
highly advanced technology in multiple
sectors. And... it shares a long land
border with China, for easing trade.
Meanwhile, China has a population of 1.4 billion people, ten
times that of Russia. With highly advanced technology and
manufacturing, China is not only a vast market for Russian
resources, it is also a gateway to the world economy.
China has already become the world’s biggest
economy over the United States, according
to some measures.
The US and Europe are post-industrial economies that are
also post-peak of their prime. Their “prime” was always
based on an extractive predatory relationship with the
rest of the world that was predicated on inflicting
conflict and poverty on others.
As China and Russia build on their strategic partnership for
mutual prosperity and peace the upshot will inevitably
entail the endgame for Western imperial powers,
which are atrophying from massive inequality,
indebtedness, moral decadence and
social decay.
Fortunately, too, and this is crucial, Russia and China have
military defenses from new generations of hypersonic
weaponry that make them impregnable against any
warmongering notions by the United States. A
failing empire like the US and its Western
satellites is always a dangerous time, as
it tries to prevent the inevitable collapse,
but starting a war with Russia & China
...is not an option.
The views & opinions expressed in the article
do not - necessarily - reflect those of Sputnik.
Barry Grossman:US, Israel
Adopting Bullying Tactics
for ICC War Crimes
Investigation in
Palestine
June 30th (FNA)
Barry Grossman is an international lawyer and political
commentator focused on human rights related issues.
He has been extensively published, on various legal
subjects and is a frequent commentator on political
affairs. He has taught law at the University of
Melbourne’s Faculty of Law and Monash
University’s Faculty of Law.
Below is the full text of the interview:
Q: How do you see the ICC ruling and the
issue of anti-Semitism raised by Israel?
A: To be sure, Benjamin Netanyahu has himself said that
“when the ICC investigates Israel for fake war crimes,
this is pure antisemitism”.
There can of course be no doubt that antisemitism is real;
indeed, every bit as real as Islam-phobia. But the long
standing ruse of conflating antisemitism with any and
all criticism of Zionism or Israel, is no longer taken
seriously, by a growing and very substantial
minority of people in the wider population.
Meanwhile the tactic of tarring everyone who resists Zionism
or criticises Israel with the antisemitism brush is having the
unfortunate, though not necessarily unintended
consequence of discrediting even the most
genuine efforts to draw attention to those
people whose speech is, indeed,
motivated by little more than
hatred for Jews.
Q: There are huge media attacks towards ICC’s probe to
Israeli war crimes in Palestine. Do you believe the ICC
can make a correct ruling under this media hegemony?
A: Propaganda about the ICC case published by the
Atlantic World’s Corporate Media Cartel is of course
preceded by pressure and instructions from think-
tanks, as well as the security/policy making
apparatus, which are, of course, fully
infiltrated by individuals promoting
Zionist agendas.
In that regard, both the US and Israel have openly declared
their hostile intentions towards the ICC and there is already
clear evidence that they're deploying all their usual tactics,
including intimidation, extortion, bribery and garden variety
corruption, to get politicians around the world, lawyers
involved in making Palestine’s case, and members of
the ICC to fall into line.
That said, if the myriad jurisdiction related technicalities
raised by Israel can be overcome, I am quite sure the
ICC is capable of reaching what many of us consider
the correct position regarding ubiquitous war crimes
and other violations of international law, perpetrated
by the occupation.
The real problem is that the ICC is quite limited in its ability
to enforce any ruling against responsible individuals and
Israeli organizations, so long as the key Atlantic World
nations continue to provide unqualified support for
the occupation, or, at the very least, to remain
neutral, in the face of clear evidence of the
occupation’s crimes.
A second very significant strategic issue arises from a
prevailing political reality which dictates that, in order
to make a reasonable finding about the occupation’s
crimes, the ICC will also have to use its authority to
investigate violations of international law alleged
against Hamas and other Palestinian groups ---
bearing in mind that the law of armed conflict
does not concern itself with the order in
which things played out and any finding
against Palestinian groups will certainly
receive far more traction, both in the
international community as well as
in occupied Palestine, than any
finding of culpability on the
part of the occupation.
Indeed, from where I sit, I do not see Palestine as
having much to gain from this process, but it
does stand to lose no small part of the
standing in public opinion, which it
has taken decades to develop, at
the cost of thousands of
Palestinian lives.
Q: Is it hypocrisy that Israel says Palestine is not
a sovereign state to have a delegation at ICC?
A: Hypocrisy hardly even begins to cover it. No nation
is in a position to dictate that Palestine is not a
sovereign nation-state, even if the UN has not
yet extended Palestine’s observer nation
status to full membership --- the way it
quickly recognized Israel’s existence
as a full member, in 1949.
It is also worth remembering that
31 UN member nations still do
not recognize Israel.
Of course, none of this is relevant to the Palestinian
delegation’s participation in ICC proceedings
investigating allegations of war crimes and
other violations of international law
committed against Palestinians by
Israeli nationals & organizations,
even though Israel is not, itself,
a party to the ICC treaty.
On the other hand, the Palestinian Authority (PA),
whose statehood and sovereignty has been
subject to intense dispute across the
international community... is a
signatory to the Rome Statute
(that is, the ICC Treaty), so it
would be bizarre, if it was
not permitted to have a
delegation present, at
the ICC proceedings.
US Encirclement of China:
A 'Progress' Report
by Brian Berletic
May 22nd (The Saker)
We post this long-read article in full -
as the New Eastern Outlook site has
been down for a number of days.
Tensions between Washington and Beijing are not merely
the recent results of former US President Donald Trump’s
time in office – but rather, just the latest chapter in US
efforts to contain China, that stretch back decades.
Indeed, US foreign policy has, for decades, admittedly aimed at encircling and containing China’s rise, and maintaining primacy over the Indo-Pacific region.
The “Pentagon Papers” leaked in 1969 would admit in
regards to the ongoing US war against Vietnam that:
…the February decision to bomb North Vietnam and the
July approval of Phase I deployments make sense only
if they are in support of a long-run United States policy
to contain China.
The papers also admitted that China, “looms as a major
power threatening to undercut [American] importance
and effectiveness in the world and, more remotely but
more menacingly, to organize all of Asia against
[America].
The papers also made it clear that there were (and still are),
“three fronts to a long-run effort to contain China: (a) the
Japan-Korea front; (b) the India-Pakistan front; and (c)
the Southeast Asia front.”
Since then, it is clear that from the continued US military
presence in both Japan and South Korea, the now two
decades-long US occupation of Afghanistan on both
Pakistan’s and China’s borders, and the emergence
of the so-called “Milk Tea Alliance” aimed at over-
throwing Southeast Asian governments friendly
with China and replacing them with US-backed
client regimes – this policy to contain China
endures up to today.
Assessing US activity along these three fronts reveals
the progress and setbacks Washington faces -- and
the various dangers to global peace and stability
Washington’s continued belligerence poses.
The Japan-Korea Front
Military.com in their article, “Here’s What It Costs to
Keep US Troops in Japan and South Korea,” reports:
In all, more than 80,000 US troops are deployed to Japan
and South Korea. In Japan alone, the US maintains more
than 55,000 deployed troops — the largest forward-
deployed US force anywhere in the world.
The article notes that according to the US Government
Accountability Office (GAO), the US spent “$34 billion
to maintain military presences in Japan and South
Korea between 2016 and 2019.”
The article cites the GAO providing an explanation as to
why this massive US military presence is maintained in
East Asia:
“…US forces help strengthen alliances, promote a free
and open Indo-Pacific region, provide quick response
to emergencies and are essential for US national
security.”
“Alliances” that are “strengthened” by the physical
presence of what are -- essentially, -- occupying US
forces, suggests the “alliance” is hardly voluntary and claims of promoting a “free and open Indo- Pacific region” is highly subjective – begging the question of, to whom, is the Indo-Pacific “free and open”.
And as US power wanes both regionally in the Indo-
Pacific as well as globally, Washington has placed
increasing pressures on both Japan and South
Korea to not only help shoulder this financial
burden, but to also become more proactive
within Washington’s containment strategy
toward China.
Japan is one of three other nations (the US itself,
Australia, and India) drafted into the US-led
Quadrilateral Security Dialogue – also
known as the “Quad.”
Rather than the US solely depending on its own military
forces based within Japanese territory or supported by
its Japan-based forces, Japan’s military along with
India’s and Australia’s are also being recruited to
take part in military exercises and operations
in and around the South China Sea.
India’s inclusion in the Quad also fits well into the US
3-front strategy that made up Washington’s contain-
ment policy toward China as early as the 1960s.
The India-Pakistan Front
In addition to recruiting India into the Quad alliance, the
US helps encourage escalation through political
support and media campaigning of India’s
various territorial disputes with China.
The US also targets Pakistan’s close and ongoing
relationship with China – including the support of
armed insurgents in Pakistan’s Baluchistan
province.
Recently, a bombing at a hotel in Quetta, Baluchistan
appears to have targeted China’s ambassador to
Pakistan, Ambassador Nong Rong.
The BBC in its article, “Pakistan hotel bomb:
Deadly blast hits luxury venue in Quetta,”
would claim:
Initial reports had suggested the target
was China’s ambassador.
Ambassador Nong Rong is understood to be in Quetta
but was not present at the hotel at the time of the
attack on Wednesday.
The article also noted:
Balochistan province, near the Afghan border,
is home to several armed groups, including
separatists.
Separatists in the region want independence from the
rest of Pakistan and accuse the government and
China of exploiting Balochistan, one of
Pakistan’s poorest provinces, for its
gas and mineral wealth.
Absent from the BBC’s reporting is the extensive and
open support the US government has provided these
separatists over the years and how – clearly – this is
more than just a local uprising against perceived
injustice, but yet another example of armed
conflict-by-proxy waged by Washington
against China.
As far back as 2011 publications like The National
Interest in articles like, “Free Baluchistan” would
openly advocate expanding US support for
separatism in Pakistan’s Baluchistan
province.
The article was written by the late Selig Harrison
--- who was a senior fellow at the US-based
(corporate-financier funded) Centre for
International Policy --- & would claim:
Pakistan has given China a base at Gwadar in the
heart of Baluch territory. So an independent
Baluchistan... would serve US strategic
interests, in addition to the immediate
goal, of countering Islamist forces.
Of course, “Islamist forces”... is a euphemism for US-
Persian Gulf state sponsored militants used to both
fight Western proxy wars, as well as serve as a
pretext for Western intervention. Citing
“Islamist forces” in Baluchistan,
Pakistan - clearly - serves as an example of the latter.
In addition to op-eds published by influential policy
think tanks, US legislators like US Representative
Dana Rohrabacher, had proposed resolutions
such as (emphasis added),
“US House of Representatives Concurrent Resolution
104 (112th): Expressing the sense of Congress that
the people of Baluchistan, currently divided
between Pakistan, Iran, and Afghanistan,
have the right to self-determination and
to their own sovereign country.”
There is also funding provided to adjacent, political
groups supporting separatism in Baluchistan,
Pakistan, as listed by the US government’s
own National Endowment for Democracy
(NED) website under “Pakistan.”
Organizations like the “Association for Integrated
Development Balochistan” are funded by the US government and used to mobilize people
politically, constituting clear interference
by the US, in Pakistan’s internal
political affairs.
The Gwadar Port project is a key juncture within China’s
growing global network of infrastructure projects, as
part of its One Belt, One Road initiative. The US
clearly opposes China’s rise & has articulated robust strategies to counter it; everything up to and including, open war, as seen in the Pentagon Papers, regarding the Vietnam War.
The recent bombing in Baluchistan, Pakistan demonstrates
that this strategy continues, in regards to utilizing local
militants to target Chinese-Pakistani co-operation, and
is one part of the much wider, region-wide strategy:
of encircling and containing China.
The Southeast Asia Front
Of course the US war against Vietnam was part of a wider
effort to reassert Western primacy over Southeast Asia
...and deny the region from fueling China’s inevitable rise.
The US having lost the war and almost completely retreating
from the Southeast Asia region saw Southeast Asia itself
repair relations amongst themselves and with China.
Today, the nations of Southeast Asia count China as their
largest trade partner, investor, a ''key partner'' in infra-
structure development, a key supplier for the region’s
armed forces, as well as providing the majority of
tourism arrivals throughout the region. For
countries like Thailand, more tourists
arrive from China, than from all
Western nations combined.
Because existing governments in Southeast Asia have
nothing to benefit from by participating in American
belligerence toward China, the US has found it
necessary to cultivate and attempt to install
into power various client regimes. This has
been an ongoing process, since the
Vietnam War.
The US has targeted each nation individually for years.
In 2009 & 2010, US-backed opposition leader-in-exile,
Thaksin Shinawatra, deployed his “red shirt” rioters
in back-to-back riots - the latter of which included
some 300 armed militants and culminated in city-
wide arson across Bangkok, and the death of
over 90 police, soldiers, protesters, and
bystanders.
In 2018, US-backed opposition groups took power in
Malaysia after the US poured millions of dollars, for
over a decade, in building up the opposition.
Daniel Twining of the US National Endowment for Democracy subsidiary – the International
Republican Institute – admitted, during a talk by the Center for Strategic & International Studies, that same year, that:
…for 15 years working with NED resources, we worked
to strengthen Malaysian opposition parties -- and guess
what happened 2 months ago after 61 years? They won.
He would elaborate on how the NED’s network played a
direct role in placing US-backed opposition figures into
power, within the Malaysian government, stating:
I visited and I was sitting there with many of the leaders
the new leaders of this government, many of whom
were just our partners we had been working with
for 15 years and one of the most senior of them
who’s now one of the people running the
government said to me, ‘gosh IRI you
never gave up on us even when we
were ready to give up
on ourselves.’
Far from “promoting freedom” in Malaysia ---- Twining
would make clear the ultimate objective of interfering
in Malaysia’s internal political affairs, was to serve
US interests, not only in regards to Malaysia, but
in regards to the entire region and specifically
toward encircling and containing China.
Twining would boast:
…guess what one of the first steps the
new government took? It froze Chinese
infrastructure investments.
And that:
[Malaysia] is not a hugely pro-American country. It is
probably never going to be an actual US ally, but this
is going to redound to our benefit, and and that’s
an example of the long game.
It is a pattern that has repeated itself in Myanmar over
the decades --- with NED money building a parallel
political system within the nation and eventually
leading to Aung San Suu Kyi and her US-backed
National League for Democracy (NLD) party
taking power in 2016.
For Myanmar, so deep and extensive is US backing for
opposition groups there, that the elections virtually
guarantee US-backed candidates win.. every single
time. The US National Endowment for Democracy’s
own website alone... lists over 80 programs and
organizations receiving US government money
- for everything from election polling, and
building up political parties - to funding
media networks and “environmental”
groups used to block any Chinese-
initiated infrastructure projects.
The move by Myanmar’s military in February this year,
ousting Aung Sang Suu Kyi and the NLD, was meant to correct this.
However, in addition to backing political groups
protesting in the streets, the US has – for many
decades – backed and armed ethnic rebels
across the country. These rebels have now
linked up with the US-backed NLD and are
repeating the US-backed regime change
tactics used against the Arab World in 2011 --- in nations like Libya, Yemen,
and Syria – including explicit calls
for “international intervention.”
A US-Engineered “Asia Spring”
Just as the US did during the 2011 “Arab Spring” – the US
State Department, in a bid to create synergies across
its various regime change campaigns in Asia, has
introduced the “Milk Tea Alliance” to transform
individual US-backed regime change efforts in Asia, into a region-wide crisis.
The BBC itself admits in articles like, “Milk Tea
Alliance: Twitter creates emoji for pro-
democracy activists,” and that:
The alliance has brought together anti-Beijing protesters, in Hong Kong and Taiwan, with pro-democracy campaigners in Thailand and Myanmar.
Omitted from the BBC’s coverage of the “Milk Tea Alliance”
(intentionally) is the actual common denominators that
unite it – US funding through fronts like the National
Endowment for Democracy and a unifying hatred
of China - based exclusively on talking points
pushed by the US State Department itself.
Circling back to the Pentagon Papers and recalling the
coordinated, regional campaign the US sought to
encircle China with – we can then look at more
recent US government policy papers like the
“Indo-Pacific Framework” published in the
White House archives from the Trump
administration.
The policy paper’s first bullet point asks:
How to maintain US strategic primacy in the Indo-Pacific
region, and promote a liberal economic order, while
preventing China from establishing new, illiberal
spheres of influence, and cultivating areas of
cooperation to promote regional peace
and prosperity?
The paper also discusses information campaigns designed
to “educate” the world about “China’s coercive behaviour
and to influence operations around the globe.” These
campaigns have materialized in a propaganda war
fabricating accusations of “Chinese genocide” in
Xinjiang, China, claims that Chinese telecom
company Huawei is a global security threat,
and that China – not the US – is the single
largest threat to global peace and
stability today.
In reality US policy aimed at encircling China -- is
predicated upon Washington’s desire to continue
its own decades-long impunity upon the global
stage, and the continuation of all the wars,
humanitarian crises, and abuses, that
have stemmed from it.
Understanding the full scope of Washington’s
“competition” with China... helps unlock the
confusion surrounding unfolding individual
crises like the trade war; the ongoing
violence and turmoil in Myanmar;
bombings in southwest Pakistan;
students mobs in Thailand; riots
in Hong Kong; and attempts by
the US to transform the South
China Sea, into an inter- national conflict.
Understanding that these events are all connected - then
assessing the success or failure of US efforts - gives us a clearer picture of the overall success of Washington in encircling China. It also gives governments and
regional blocs a clearer picture of how to manage policy, in protecting against US subversion: that threatens national, regional, and global peace
and stability.
Brian Berletic, is a Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.
Australians should be ashamed that they have a regime propped up to serve US racist agendas!
How Exceptional America Is
by Eric Zuesse
September 30th, 2020
America is becoming exceptionally exceptional. In some votes
at the UN General Assembly - the Assembly of nations - only
Israel, or one or two other U.S. allies, vote along with it, and
all others either vote against it, or else abstain in order to
prevent U.S. retaliation against their own nation. No other
nation is anything like that. In fact, on many occasions,
the U.S. arm-twists other delegations -- in order to get
them to abstain from voting so as to make less stark,
and less embarrassing, America’s international
isolation. But America is also extraordinarily
exceptional in other ways, which have
nothing to do with the UN.
America is truly an exceptional nation. As the
Republican Party magazine National Review
stated, on September 15th, “Last week,
the US and Israel were the only states to vote against a General Assembly resolution on the coronavirus response. Some have seized upon that vote to paint the
USt as a bad faith actor that stands alone in the world.”
However, this vote wasn’t about only “the global
coronavirus response.” It was — perhaps even
more importantly - about U.S. sanctions against
Iran, Venezuela, Syria, Russia, China, and other
countries that the U.S. regime considers to be
its enemies. (None of these countries ever
invaded or even threatened to invade
the USA; all of those sanctions are
100% U.S. aggression.
They are target-countries that America’s aristocracy
wants to take over. (The world’s U.S.-sanctioned
countries are marked in red -- on the map of the
world below.) Israel strongly supports sanctions
against both Syria and Venezuela, and routinely
invades and bombs Syria just for good measure.
So, it joined America’s position on that.
That UN General Assembly vote was held on September
11th. America’s Associated Press bannered the next day,
“UN assembly approves pandemic resolution; US, Israel
object”, and reported that, “The 193-member world body
adopted the resolution by a vote of 169-2, with Ukraine
and Hungary abstaining. It was a strong show of unity
by the UN’s most representative body, though many
countries had hoped for adoption by consensus.”
The AP further stated:
It calls on governments and international financial institutions
“to provide more liquidity in the financial system, especially
in all developing countries.” It supports recovery plans that
“drive transformative change towards more inclusive and
just societies, including by empowering and engaging all
women and girls.”
And it urges UN member nations “to adopt a climate- and
environment-responsive approach to COVID-19 recovery
efforts”, including by aligning investments and domestic
policies with the UN goals & the 2015 Paris agreement
to combat climate change. …
By a vote of 132-3, the assembly amended the resolution to
urge all countries “to refrain from promulgating and applying
any unilateral economic, financial or trade measures not in
accordance with international law and the Charter of the
United Nations that impedes the full achievement of
economic and social development, particularly in
developing countries.”
The United States was then overwhelmingly defeated in
attempts to remove 2 paragraphs from the resolution,
one referring to women’s rights to “sexual and
reproductive health” --- and the other --- to
“promoting global sustainable transport.”
In addition to arguing against the language on sanctions,
the United States opposed all references to the World
Health Organization, which the US administration had
stopped funding, accusing the UN agency of failing
to do enough to stop the virus from spreading
when it first surfaced in China.
Nowhere in the AP’s article was any mention made that
in the “vote of 169-2,” the two nations which had voted
against the Resolution were the US and Israel, but only
that there had been “objections from the United States
and Israel,” regarding attachment, to the Resolution, of
the Amendment that added the anti-sanctions provision
to it. This omission was not an error. It is a type of
omission that is common in propaganda. America
was more isolated than that ‘news’-report
made clear.
This vote was about only a “Resolution,” a statement of
the various nations’ values, to work toward, not about
any nation’s policy, but the U.S. and Israel don’t share
those goals — not even rhetorically. This opposition
to that Resolution’s goals, was truly exceptional.
In particular, nothing is more abhorrent to the US regime
--- than to stop or impede its sanctions. These sanctions
include, for example, punishments against any company
or government that will, in any way, assist in Russia’s 96%
completed NordStream 2 natural gas pipeline to Germany,
for the EU to buy Russia’s pipelined natural gas instead of
America’s fracked, canned, shipped, natural gas. The U.S.
regime insists that EU nations buy the far costlier trans-
Atlantic-shipped fracked US liquefied natural gas (LNG).
That insistence upon the EU’s wasting money, in order to
prop-up America’s fracking industry, is, indeed, exceptional,
because European nations haven’t customarily been treated
as being mere colonies of other powers. America is treating
purchasers from, or cooperators with, that competitor (Russia),
as being its enemies. The way the U.S. Representative stated
this (after a lengthy diatribe which blamed China for Covid-19
and said that the U.S. had quit the World Health Organization
because WHO lacked “independence from the Chinese
Communist Party”) was: “Economic sanctions are a
legitimate means to achieve foreign policy, security,
and other national and international objectives, and
the United States is not alone in that view or in that
practice.” (That exact same sentence had, earlier,
been stated by the US regarding a different matter,
on 18 November 2019.) Actually, the U.S. regime is
very “alone” on it. Furthermore, the other part was
also a lie: the U.S. regime asserts that coercing
corporations and countries to not buy from the
lowest-cost supplier, is within its sovereign
right to do.
However, as Professor Alfred de Zayas, who until recently was
the UN’s top expert on this topic, explained in depth on 27th
June 2019, that assertion is blatantly false, on many clear
grounds concerning international law. It is a blatant lie, no
matter how many times the U.S. regime asserts it (and
asserts that the US regime isn’t “alone” in asserting it).
Even back when Barack Obama (the man who repeatedly
claimed that “The United States is and remains, the one
indispensable nation”) was America’s President, the US
was exceptional at the United Nations. For example, on
24th November 2014, I headlined “U.S. Among Only 3
Countries Officially Backing Nazism & Holocaust-
Denial”, and reported that - “In a UN vote, on
November 21st, only 3 countries - the US, Ukraine, and Canada — voted against a resolution to condemn racist fascism,
or nazism, and to condemn denial of Germany’s World War II Holocaust against, primarily, Jews.''
This measure passed the General Assembly, on a vote of 115
in favour, 3 against, & 55 abstentions (the abstentions were
in order not to offend U.S. President Obama, who was
opposed to the resolution).” Then, on 21 June 2015,
I headlined “America’s UN Ambassador Continues
Standing Up for Nazis” and noted that, again,
Obama’s UN Ambassador, Samantha Power,
had stood up for nazism; she had just
delivered an address -- in Ukraine --
rallying that country’s supporters
of nazism to war against Russia.
Then, on 21 November 2017, I headlined “Trump
Continues Obama’s Support of Nazism”, and
reported that:
On November 16th, US President Donald Trump, acting
through an agent of his agent, UN Ambassador Nikki
Haley, voted at the UN against a resolution that
condemns bigotry, and especially condemns
nazism & all forms of racism. He thus, yet
again, continues in the tradition from his
predecessors, Presidents Obama, and
Bush, each year, placing this nation in
the company of only one or two U.S.
allies throughout the world who join
with the US in refusing to commit to
opposing and doing everything to
reduce, not just political Nazism
(which, of course, is past), but
ideological nazism, racist
fascism - institutionalized
bigotry (which, sadly, is
not past).
But, be that as it may, the U.S. is also exceptional in
many other ways. I listed some of those on July 13th.
There are two main reasons why the U.S. regime is able
to coerce other nations to not violate its will. One is that
although publicly available reports allege it spends
approximately 37% of the entire world’s military
expenditures, the U.S. regime actually - spends
around 50% of the entire world’s military costs,
and therefore, it possesses an extraordinary
physical capacity to impose its will, if and
when merely economically blockading an
‘enemy’ country (via sanctions) fails to do the job of getting it to comply.
And the other main reason is that, since the US government
is at least as corrupt as the average “third-world” country is,
but is instead one of the world’s richest countries, arranging
pay-offs to other world leaders, in order to obtain their
cooperation, is easily affordable... (These payoffs are
being paid by all US.taxpayers, not by only America’s
billionaires, who reap all of the profits from the
empire that is imposed.)
American exceptionalism is real. It’s not the type of
exceptionalism that the regime’s propaganda claims
to be the case, but, nonetheless, it is real.
(Strategic Culture Foundation)
Please watch the video above... We have never existed in such peril, and yet almost no-one is able to act.
Nuclear words: Putin's FINAL warning:
(People DO need reminding -- unless US, UK and French policy changes, and stops being so 'exceptional' -- that is, outside the UN legal Charter and thus, criminal --- there will be a reaping.)
World Will Not Survive the US' Neocons' Doctrine of US World Hegemony - Paul Graig Roberts Wednesday, February 7th, 2018
"The government of the United States is clearly in demonic hands. We are overflowing with proof", writes American well known analytist and ex- official Paul Graig Roberts in his website.
Take today (2-2-18) for example. A report from the House Intelligence Committee was released that is proof that the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Justice --- and the Democrat National Committee, are now in a conspiracy against American democracy and the President of the United States, with the full support of the presstitute media.
As if that is not enough, also released today, is the Pentagon’s new Nuclear Posture Review. A nuclear posture review specifies a country’s attitude to nuclear weapons and their use. In past posture reviews, nuclear weapons were regarded as unusable except in retaliation for a nuclear attack. The assumption was that no one would use them. There was always the chance that false warnings of incoming ICBMs would result in a nuclear button being pushed - setting off Armageddon.
There were many false warnings during the Cold War
President Ronald Reagan, was very concerned about a false warning, ending in mass death & destruction.
This is why his principal goal was to end the Cold War, which he succeeded in doing. It did not take successor governments long, to resurrect the Cold War.
The new US nuclear posture is a reckless, irresponsible, and destabilizing departure from the previous attitude toward nuclear weapons. The use of even a small part of the existing arsenal of the United States would be sufficient to destroy life on earth. Yet, the posture review calls for more weapons, speaks of nuclear weapons as “usable,” and justifies their use in First Strikes, even against countries that do not have nuclear weapons.
This is an insane escalation. It tells every country that the US government, believes in the first use of nuclear weapons against any & every country. Nuclear powers such as Russia & China must see this to be a massive increase in the threat level from the US.
Those responsible for this document should be committed to insane aslyums, not left in policy positions where they can put it into action.
The neoconservatives are a small group of conspirators. Most neoconservatives are Jews allied with Israel. Some are dual-citizens. They created an ideology of US world hegemony, specifying that the chief goal of US foreign policy, is to prevent the rise of any other power that could serve as a constraint on US unilateralism.
As neoconservatives control US foreign policy, this explains US hostility toward Russia and China and also the neo-conservatives’ use of the US military to remove governments in the Middle East, seen by Israel as obstacles to Israeli expansion. For two decades --- the US has been fighting wars for Israel in the Middle East. This fact proves the power and influence of the insane neo- conservatives. It is certain, that people as insane as the neoconservatives, would launch a nuclear attack on Russiaand China.
The Russian and Chinese governments seem to be completely unaware of the threat that the neo- conservatives pose to them. I have never experienced in interviews with Russians and Chinese, any awareness of the neo- conservative ideology. Possibly, it is too insane for them to grasp.
Ideologues such as the neoconservatives are not fact-based
They are chasing their dream of world hegemony. Russia & China are in the way of this hegemony. Having learned the limits of conventional military power—after 20 years the US “superpower” has been unable to defeat a few thousand lightly armed Taliban in Afghanistan—the neo-conservatives know: conventional invasions of Russia or China, would lead to the total defeat of US forces.
Therefore, the neoconservatives have elevated nuclear weapons to a First Strike, usable, arsenal that in the neoconservative dream of world hegemony can be used to destroy Russia and China.
Ideologues who divorce themselves from the facts create a virtual world for themselves. Their belief in their ideology blinds them to the risks for them- selves and others that they impose on the world.
Thanks to the American liberal/progressive/left, the entirety of the world is faced with a far more likely nuclear demise than ever threatened us during the Cold War with the Soviet Union.
By its collaboration with the military/security complex & the corrupt Hillary DNC, the liberal/progressive/left has forever discredited itself. It is now seen by every thinking person worldwide as an insane propaganda ministry --- for the neoconservatives’ plan to use nuclear weapons to eliminate constraints on US unilateralism.
The liberal/progressive/left has endorsed “hegemony or death.”
They will get death. For all of us.
(Source - DONi News Agency)
According to: PaulGraigRoberts.org
Legendary memorial at Saur-Tomb ''restored by May 2017''
DPR authorities have finished restoring the Saur-Tomb by May 2017. It was announced by the Building Minister, Sergey Naymets.
‘Saur Tomb has been being restored since November, and we planned to finish this by May 2017’, the Minister said.
He said "many people contributed to this project of restoration of the memorial damaged by shelling," Naumets noted.
____________________________
Cool Russia!
[Eng Subs] Children of Donbass, "Toys for Poroshenko" Music Video by Artem Grishanov
POWERFUL - PUT THIS ON HEADPHONES. I guarantee you will cry - and if you don't - please seek psychiatric help.
Full Text: Official Declaration of the Malorossiyan Federation
Zakharchenko announces a new federal state, Malorossiya, (means ''Little Russia'') as the legal successor of Ukraine. DONi News Agency
On 18.7.2017 the Head of the Donetsk People's Republic, Alexander Zakharchenko, declared the creation of a new federal state, Malorossiya, which will become the legal successor of 'Ukraine'. The new state formation, will consist of 19 regions of the former Ukraine with the capital in Donetsk city. Kiev remains a historical and cultural centre, without the status of capital city.
Here is the full English translation of the declaration:
Political Declaration
The project of the state of "Ukraine", formulated 150 years ago and implemented in different versions during the 20th century, has reached its logical conclusion --- and led to the country's disintegration, civil war and the death of tens of thousands of people, including children, women, and elderly people.
And this process is irreversible. An attempt to turn the story back will result in "balkanization" of the conflict, expansion of chaos, escalation of civil war and even bigger numbers of casualties.
To stop the civil war and avoid new victims, we representatives of the majority of the regions of former "Ukraine" assembled in Donetsk on July 18, 2017, discussed the current situation and came to the following conclusions:
- the state of "Ukraine" has revealed itself as a failed state and demonstrated its being incapable of granting its inhabitants a peaceful and prosperous present and future;
- the current authorities – elected in Kiev, after the coup d'etat, against the backdrop of political terror and the absence of elections in the Crimea and Donbass, are illegitimate;
- the state of "Ukraine" is on the brink of economic catastrophe and depopulation;
- an ultranationalist coup is brewing in Kiev, as a result of which outright neo-Nazis will come to power insteadof "Banderites with a European face";
- the Ukrainian nationalistic project (the Galician one) has discredited itself, by the shedding of civilians' blood in the country;
- the ideology of "Ukrainism" has proved to be misanthropic, mixed with xenophobia (Russophobia, anti-Semitism, Polonophobia) and neo-Nazism (the ideology of national exclusivity and superiority);
- resulting from historical development and due to the Maidan, the word "Ukraine" is forever associated with the names of the Nazi accomplices, Bandera and Shukhevich, with the tragedies of the Baby Yar, the Volyn massacre & Khatyn, and, nowadays, with the mass murder of people on the Maidan, in the Trade Unions' House in Odessa, and Genocide of the Donbass people.
On the basis of the above, we believe that the state of "Ukraine", in the form it was established, after the collapse of the USSR, is UNSERVICEABLE.
We, representatives of the regions of the former "Ukraine", propose to re-establish the state and to proclaim the state of MALOROSSIYA, under an historical background, out of the former "Ukraine". In this case, it is of fundamental importance to rename the country, since "Ukraine" as a state, is guilty of war crimes, mass terror and the genocide of its own people.
In turn, the new name of the country, based on historical traditions, will enable us to reunify those pieces of the former "Ukraine" that seemed to have parted ways forever, including because of participation in the civil war, on different sides of the front line.
We must turn the page of our people's history, which is flooded with the blood of our brothers and sisters.
Malorossiya is an INDEPENDENT, SOVEREIGN state, with a new name, a new flag, a new constitution, a new state structure, new principles of social and economic development, and new historical prospectives.
But this is NOT A REVOLUTION ! This is a return to history. This is a novelty that restores, not destroys.
In view of the economic plight of the country, the chaos & disintegration potential, and regarding the possibility of launching a "war of all against all", we consider it necessary to declare a state of emergency for the transition period – up to 3 years. During this time, the process of adoption of the new Constitution and the establishment of the rule of law, should be completed.
Under a state of emergency, a ban on the activities of political parties and foreign funds is to be introduced, & penalties for criminal offenses, especially against the person, are to be increased. The fight against corruption will be toughened, as well as the penalties for it.The shadow arms market is to be eliminated, including by registering weapons in accordance with the new law.
In the same period an investigation is to be carried out, with the involvement of foreign specialists –- from Russia, Belarus & the European Union –- into the crimes committed by the Maidan Kiev regime: the murders on the Maidan, the murder of Odessa citizens in the Trade Unions' House on May 2nd, 2014, and the war crimes in Donbass, in the so-called ATO.
In the same period, the People's Tribunal is to be prepared to charge the state criminals who have led the country into disintegration and civil war: V.F. Yanukovich (with a request to Russia for his extradition), P.A. Poroshenko and his clique: Turchinov, Yatsenyuk, Kolomoisky, Paruby, Nalivaichenko and others.
We are sure that, having recovered from the criminal neo-Nazi ideology of "Ukrainism", we will be able to build a new society on the basis of friendship and mutual assistance -- but not hatred and envy. The creative genius of our people will manage to bring Malorossiya to the forefront of global civilization and play a role in history. The role of Good, and Truth.
Official translation by the DONi Donbass News Agency, 07/18/2017
(Source - Russia Insider)
_____________________________________________
Nato – A Dangerous Alliance May 24th
As Nato ends its summit in Brussels, Rae Street explains why the military alliance remains a threat to world peace
When the Warsaw Pact ended, after the collapse of communism, some optimists might have expected Nato to be broken up too. After all, the Labour Party in Britain had been opposed to Nato in the mid-1980s. But that was not to be. The US, which had always dominated Nato, quickly began to reinvent Nato and furthermore, to expand it.
Following the end of the Warsaw Pact many central and east European governments wanted to join Nato. This, of course, was music to the ears of the US military manufacturers. Indeed, the chair of the expand Nato committee, Bruce Jackson, was technical director of Lockheed Martin, the largest military manufacturer in the world. So, for the new Nato members because of the policy on “interoperability,” that is Nato personnel being able to use the same military equipment, it was out with the old Soviet military hard- ware and in with sales of, for example, Lockheed’s military aircraft ,costing millions of dollars.
This continues to this day in countries which can ill afford it, with struggling economies. The latter includes Greece. Think of the situation in Greece today.
Expanding Nato up to the borders with Russia, was a provocative policy. The dangers were pointed out but the military industrial complex and the “hawks” in the West, took no notice.
To this day, this helps President Vladimir Putin: more and more of the Russian people believe that “the West” is against them.
Decades later, we read: “British troops have arrived in Estonia, as part of a major Nato mission in the Baltic states, to deter Russian aggression.”
From the start, Nato has always held a nuclear armed policy. It continues to claim that nuclear weapons “preserve peace.” Manifestly, nuclear weapons do not deter conflict.
Governments, including Britain’s, now analyse the main threats to security as cyber warfare and terrorism. Remember September 11th 2001, when New York was attacked by terrorists in planes, brandishing knives?
The US then had and still has, 13 nuclear armed Trident submarines, of which several will be roaming the seas fully operational. Britain has four, with one constantly on alert at sea.
Were these any use in the madman’s attack on Westminster, or in any terrorist attacks?
Trident is “integrated” into Nato. Even worse, Nato still has a policy of “first use of nuclear weapons.”
When the then minister of defence, Geoff Hoon, was asked in Parliament why Britain has a policy of “first use,” he replied: “Because of our obligations to Nato.”
Under the direction of the US administration, with its policy of global domination, Nato has established a string of nuclear-armed bases across Europe, in Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Turkey, at Incirlik.
The latter is now causing deep problems as relations between President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and the US, become more and more fractious.
There is now a real problem for Nato, as Erdogan is a repressive dictator — how can Turkey remain in Nato?
Nato states are supposed to uphold principles of human rights and democracy, notably lacking in Turkey today.
The nuclear-armed bases come under Nato’s “nuclear sharing policy” — in effect a violation of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Nato continues to expand. The policy of not acting “out of area” was dropped long ago. “North Atlantic” simply means, a domination of policies by the US.
Nato claims in its “strategic concept” that “the promotion of Euro-Atlantic security is best assured through a wide network of partner relationships with countries and organisations around the globe.”
In 1994 Nato established the Partnerships for Peace across Europe, extending as far as Uzbekistan.
Nato surrounds Russia from the west and east. These Partnerships for Peace (note the language again) now include 22 states, including “neutral” Ireland.
Then there is the ''Mediterranean Dialogue,'' with ''arrangements'' with countries in the Middle East. Few people realise that Nato carries out military exercises with Israel.
Nato has also established bilateral relations — named individual partnerships — with Afghanistan, Australia, Iraq, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Mongolia, New Zealand and Pakistan.
In this part of the globe, where Nato carried out a military exercise in 2014 with Japan, named Ocean Shield, they are surrounding and menacing China, as the enemy.
Then there was the statement by Nato that “co-operation between Nato and the United Nations continues to make a substantial contribution to security in operations round the world.
“The alliance aims to deepen political dialogue and practical co-operation with the UN, as set out in the Nato/UN declaration, signed in 2008.”
This seems like Nato bidding to be the UN's military arm.
This hardly accords with the UN Charter. It was the Organisation for Security & Co-operation in Europe, set up under Chapter 8, of the UN Charter, to prevent and resolve conflict by non-military means and to promote co-operation in humanitarian and other fields.
The 54 member states stretch from Iceland to Kyrgyzstan and include Russia. Alas, how many times do you read of their work in the press, compared with the times you hear about Nato?
Nato is sold to us as a peace-making body. After all, the US is home to the finest PR companies in the world.
To summarise, Nato is pursuing yet more militarism and war:
- All Nato states are required to increase their military budgets to 2 per cent of GDP. That means stealing more money from social needs. Readers of the Morning Star know those all too well: the NHS, education, adult social services; the list is endless.
- Nato member states will have to spend 20 per cent of defence budgets on military equipment: warships, war planes, drones, bombs. By fuelling the arms race, Nato makes a mockery of moves for conflict resolution.
- Nato and its member states multiply interventions outside their territory and increase their presence through world- wide partnerships and “coalitions of the willing.”
- Nato extends its nuclear policies as a supreme “guarantee for the allies’ security,” notwithstanding that the majority of countries in the world are negotiating a treaty to ban nuclear weapons. In the meantime, nuclear weapons in Europe — under the guise of Nato — and elsewhere, are being modernised at a cost of many tens of billions of dollars and pounds. Think of Trident at a cost of £205 billion.
The Nato summit will be held and activists will beholding a “counter-summit” with protesters organising workshops and a demonstration.
CND activists will be there from the UK, but -- we also need people to raise the issues with their MPs, write letters to the press and raise awareness on social media.
Let’s put pressure on the government to invest in social welfare, not Nato, not war.
(Source - Morning Star)
In 2017 in the Donbass - give the children Peace!
Ethnic Ruthenes of sub-Carpathian Ukraine demand autonomy
Activists of a Slavic ethnic group known as Ruthenes -- or Rusyns -- who reside in the Trans-Carpathian (sub-Carpathian) region of Ukraine, have turned to President Pyotr Poroshenko with a demand:
recognize the results of 1991's regional referendum --- when 78% of the region's residents, voted in favor of granting it the status of a self-governing region.
"We have two main demands - to recognize the Rhuthenes as an ethnos and to acknowledge the regional referendum of 1991, where 78% sub-Carpathians voted for the region being a self-governed territory within Ukraine," Vesti quoted Ivan Palinkash, the leader of the Ruthene movement & a member of the People’s Council's presidium of Sub-Carpathian Ruthenes.
Natalya Magalina, a deputy of Uzhgorod district council, told the meeting of leaders of Ruthene ethnic organizations it is important to maintain the Ruthene language by establishing minimal norms for broadcasting in the native tongue, over the state regional TV Channel Tisa-1.
This isn't the first time that the Ruthenes of the sub- Carpathian area have asked the Kiev government to recognize the outcome of the referendum held 25 years ago. The Coordination Council of Ruthene Organizations of the Trans-Carpathian Region turned to the central authorities with the same requirement, the previous time, in the summer of 2015.
It was also in the summer of 2015 that the activists of Ruthene organizations adopted an appeal to the Council of Europe, the European Commission, the Organization for Security & Cooperation in Europe & the UN, as well as to the parliaments of Hungary, the Czech Republic, & Slovakia, to wield pressure on President Poroshenko and force the Ukrainian government towards accepting the result of their referendum.
The Ruthenes are an indigenous sub-Carpathian people. Ukrainian authorities do not consider them to be a separate ethnos, and continue calling them Ukrainians, although the UN has issued recommendations more than once, to recognize their status as a separate ethnos.
More than that, Kiev accuses the leaders of Ruthene organizations of making appeals for encroachments on the territorial integrity of the country.
(source - TASS)
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Zionist lobby preventing West from criticizing Israel: Analyst Fri Dec 16, 2016
The European Union has censured the Israeli regime for destroying Palestinian shelters and structures in the occupied territories. According to a statement by the European bloc, the Tel Aviv regime has demolished 866 structures so far in 2016 in Area C of the West Bank, which is under full Israeli military control.
Anthony Hall, editor-in-chief of the American Herald Tribune from Alberta, says that the European states have been under the influence of the Zionist lobby to go along with Israeli interests - and thus refuse to slam crimes against the Palestinian people.
“Every government within the EU has a very strong Israeli lobby, and this is one of the dilemmas that the Western people are facing,”Hall explained.
“Not only the governing parties but the opposition parties as well, are constraining discussion and discourse within a very narrow range, that puts Israeli priorities at the top of the list in all our Western countries,”he added.
The professor also called on Western citizens to“intervene directly and make contact with the Palestinian people, directly.”
“We, as the citizens in the EU, citizens in Canada, & citizens in the US, have to find ways to bypass the constraints of our governments & the biases and power of this lobby over our governments,” he noted.
Hall criticized the EU for its forensic accounting of homes demolished in Palestine.
“This type of numerical accounting fails to really describe the nature of this destruction of homes in its broader context ------ where thousands of Palestinian people are in dungeons and being tortured in Israeli incarceration facilities,” he said.
“The reality: that the world is letting this happen is very discouraging,” he added.
Hall warned that the prospect of a Palestinian state is no longer viable, given the emphasis on building up settlements, and destroying the structures of the indigenous people of Palestine.
"This goes beyond apartheid,” he said.
The Israeli policy of demolishing houses in the West Bank to build illegal settler units has affected 5,704 Palestinians, of whom, 1,221 have been rendered homeless, including 586 children.
(source - PressTv)
_____________________________________
UN Adopts"Paper Tiger" Resolution, on Israel's Withdrawal from the Syrian Golan
Fahwad Al-Khadoumi -The UN General Assembly adopted yet another resolution demanding that Israel withdraw from the occupied Syrian Golan Heights, in line with a resolution of June 4, 1967.
However, UN General Assembly resolutions are non-binding and no more than a paper tiger, with- out a unanimous decision by the permanent UN Security Council members, to enforce them; A highly unlikely prospect.
In its latest resolution, the UN General Assembly again condemned Israel's non-compliance with UN Security Council Resolution 497 (1981).
The General Assembly reiterated that Israel's decision from December 14th, 1981, to impose Israeli laws, administration & custody on the occupied Syrian Golan Heights, is null and void -- and has no legality at all.
The latest UNGA resolution was adopted by an overwhelming majority of UN member States.
The resolution --- reaffirmed the illegality of acquiring territories ----- through the use of military force. The General Assembly also repeated that Israel's continued occupation & enforcement of Israeli law & administration violates international law, the UN Charter, & the Geneva Convention's principles on the protection of civilians during war.
During the UNGA session, a number of states condemned the Israeli practices in occupied Syrian Golan, calling on Israel to withdraw from Golan, in line with June 4th, 1967.
37 states proposed the now adopted draft resolution. However, UNGA resolutions are non-binding and no more than a paper tiger, unless permanent Security Council members are willing to put their money where their mouth was, when they adopted UNSC Resolution 497 (1981) - decades ago.
Moreover, none of the permanent UNSC members - China, France, Russia, the UK and the US - took any tangible steps when the now former Israeli Foreign Minister, Avigdor Lieberman, defiantly declared that "Israel and the Golan are part and parcel" and that "the international community should get used to facing the fact that Israel will permanently annex the Syrian territory".
Most favourite scapegoat
The favorite scapegoat among permanent UNSC members, with regard to supporting Israel and neglecting Israel's illegal occupation of Golan is the US. However, Russia is in no way more actively pursuing Israel's adherence with UNSC Resolution 497 (1981) -- than any other -- of the self-anointed permanent UNSC members. In April 2016, Russia and Russian President Vladimir Putin, were ominously silent about the Golan when Israeli PM, Benjamin Netanyahu, visited Moscow.
Russia failed to respond to what Netanyahu had declared "a red line" - occupation of the Golan.
A brief review of recent history pertaining to the Israeli occupation, international affairs & Israel's use of the Golan to wage war on Syria, suffices to show that the UN System has failed, utterly, and that it is perverted to the point that many analysts call for abolishing the UN altogether.
In June 2013 an Austrian UN Disengagement & Observer Force (UNDOF) officer told the press that Israel is -- running a joint operations room with the insurgents in Syria in the Golan.The UNSC failed to respond and more importantly, failed to take action. In July 2013, the Syrian permanent representative to the UN in Geneva, Dr. Fayssal al-Hamwi, noted how Israel, since it occupied the Syrian Golan Heights in 1967, has displaced about half a million of the Golan´s original inhabitants.
Also in Feb. 2014, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu preempted a public relations quagmire by visiting a field hospital for "Syrian Freedom Fighters" in the Golan to show how much Israel cares and does, on the humanitarian front. It turned out that the "Freedom Fighters" belonged to the Syrian Al-Qaeda franchise, Jabhat al-Nusra.
In March 2014, Israel launched one of many military attacks against Syrian military and security forces, from the Golan, while the UNSC and most media were "silent".
In April 2014 The Director of Israel's Military Intelligence, Brigadier General Aviv Kochavi, a protegé of the now deceased Ariel Sharon, was appointed to head the Israeli Defense Forces Northern Command.
NSNBC international editor-in-chief, Christof Lehmann, reported that the appointment of Kochavi, indicated that Israel was planning large-scale military operations in the Golan in the near future and the widening of the Syria war. Lehmann was right on the money.
In May 2014 Israel denied Syrians in Golan the right to participate in Syrian elections. The UN was "silent". In mid-April 2016, ahead of talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu affirmed that Israel would hold on to the Golan.
A UNDOF withdrawal has left a 12-16 km wide corridor uncontrolled by the UNDOF... In 2013, it transpired that Israel was giving support to Jabhat al-Nusrah, such as a joint intelligence and military operations room in the Israeli occupied Golan, plus logistical support, weapons, field hospitals, and direct combat support.
In September 2014, Israeli machinations, resulted in the displacement of UNDOF troops from a 12-16 kilometer-wide corridor in the disengagement zone in the Golan by Jabhat Al-Nusra.. The corridor has since been used to supply Al-Nusra and the other terrorists and to launch attacks against Syria.
All permanent UNSC members with the exception of Russia were "silent". Russian diplomats tentatively spoke out against terminating the peace keeping mission in the Golan. The UNSC failed to act.
In 2015 it came out that Israel planned a major hydrocarbon extraction project in the Golan. Partners in crime include Genier Energy.
On the board of directors? Dick Cheney, James Woolsey, Bill Richardson, Jacob Lord Rothschild, Rupert Murdoch, Larry Summers and Michael Steinhardt, among others. Other players involved include the Israeli subsidiary, Afek Oil and Gas, American Shale, French Total and BP. Thus, there exists a broad and powerful nexus of US, British, French and Israeli interests: at the forefront of pushing for the break-up of Syria and control of what's believed to be potentially vast untapped oil and gas resources in the country.
On April 20th, 2016, NSNBC international editor- in-chief Christof Lehmann -- said Netanyahu's "Red Line" would be a litmus test for Russia, as a permanent UNSC member. On April 21st, after talks between Netanyahu and Putin in Moscow, it could be concluded that Russia failed -- spectacularly.
In September 2016, Israel started a wave of home demolitions in the Golan. The UNSC was "silent".
In October 2016, Israel announced plans to build 1,600 settlement units in the Golan, & none of the permanent UNSC members took any action.
So much for the latest UN General Assembly paper tiger.
_________________________________
The UK Labour MPs who didn’t back the Yemen vote have blood on their hands by David Wearing
Presenting the motion in the Commons, Thornberry was subjected to a series of ill-judged interruptions by Labour MPs, such as Kevan Jones, Toby Perkins and John Woodcock. Indeed, Thornberry received more vocal support in the chamber from the SNP group than from her own supposed comrades.
According to subsequent reports, some Labour members even tried to work with their Tory counterparts, in order to defeat their own party’s motion.
Woodcock, a former 'Progress' Chair, claimed that British support is “precisely focused on training the Saudis” to improve their targeting - so as to “create fewer civilian casualties” - parroting the official government line. The idea that the Saudis’ “widespread & systematic” attacks on civilian targets are just a series of well- meaning errors, is one that, to put it as gently as possible, lacks credibility.
And if decades of training provided by the British to the Saudi pilots hasn’t prevented these supposed errors by now --- it seems rather unlikely that it will in the near future.
In any case, this misrepresents the true nature of the UK's role. When the intervention began, the foreign secretary Philip Hammond, vowed to “support the Saudis in every practical way short of engaging in combat”, including “spare parts, maintenance, technical advice, resupply” and “logistical support”. The reality is that the Saudi Air Force, roughly half UK-supplied and half US-supplied jets, could barely function, without this ongoing assistance from Washington and London.
If there is Yemeni blood on the hands of the Saudi-led coalition - then that blood is also on the hands of the coalition’s western backers, enablers and apologists.
The Saudis and their allies can only wage this war because the Anglo-American suppliers of their air forces are providing active, material support. And British and American politicians can only collude in these outrages, because the political cost on them, so far, has been low. However, it is in the gift of their constituents – you, the reader – to change that equation.
(source - The Guardian)
This could be defeated --- with a UNITED LABOUR PARTY !!!
But unfortunately, there are "entryist" MPs who, for decades, have been groomed by CIA cold war relic organisations -- like the Atlantic Council -- and are now trying to misdirect the Labour Party towards cuts, a militarised police, and a US war agenda... and their anti-peace MPs are hobbling Labour.
129 Labour MPs voted to stop support for Saudi Arabia’s campaign in Yemen. The vote was defeated by a majority of 90.
The motion called for ---- support to be withdrawn from the Saudi government until a United Nations investigation could determine whether the Saudi bombing had breached international law.
The motion didn't explicitly include a suspension of UK arms sales.
100+ Labour MPs didn't vote on the motion. If all of them had voted to support it, the government would have been defeated.
The following, are the Labour MPs who abstained, or weren't present to vote.
Adrian Bailey Andy Burnham Angela Eagle Angela Smith Ann Clwyd Ann Coffey Anna Turley Barry Sheerman Ben Bradshaw Bridgit Phillipson Caroline Flint Catherine McKinnell Chris Bryant Chris Elmore (Teller) Chris Evans Chris Leslie Clive Lewis (ill) Connor McGinn Dan Jarvis David Crausby David Lammy Diana Johnson Fiona MacTaggart Frank Field Gareth Thomas Gavin Shuker Geoffrey Robinson George Howarth Gerald Kaufman Gill Furniss Gisela Stuart Gloria De Piero Graeme Jones Graham Allen Graham Stringer Heidi Alexander Helen Jones Ian Austin Ian Murray Ivan Lewis Jamie Reed Jim Fitzpatrick Joan Ryan John Mann John Spellar John Woodcock Judith Cummins (Teller) Julie Elliott Kate Hoey Keith Vaz Kevan Jones Kevin Barron Liz Kendall Luciana Berger Lucy Powell Madeleine Moon Margaret Beckett Margaret Hodge Maria Eagle Mark Hendrick Mary Creagh Meg Hillier (Paired) Melanie Onn Michael Dugher Mike Gapes Natascha Engel Neil Coyle Nia Griffith Pat McFadden Paul Flynn Peter Kyle Phil Wilson Rachel Reeves Rob Flello Rob Marris Roberta Blackman-Woods Rosie Cooper Rushanara Ali Ruth Smeeth Shabana Mahmood Siobhain McDonagh Stephen Kinnock Susan Jones Toby Perkins Tom Blenkinsopp Tom Watson Tracy Brabin Tristram Hunt Vernon Coaker Wayne David Wes Streeting Yasmin Qureshi Yvonne Fovargue
___________________________________
‘How Can I Deselect My Labour MP?’ A Short Guideto Reselection and Democratic Accountability by Eric Sim, excellent free advice here:
Nicolas J S Davies is the author of Blood On Our Hands: the American Invasion and Destruction of Iraq. He also wrote the chapters on “Obama at War” in Grading the 44th President: a Report Card on Barack Obama’s First Term as a Progressive (Lol) Leader.
In the past weeks, Burundi and S. Africa have joined Namibia in declaring their intention to withdraw from the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC). They are likely to be followed by a parade of other African countries, jeopardizing the future of an international court, which has prosecuted 39 officials from 8 African countries, but has failed to indict a single person who is not African.
Ironically, African countries were among the first to embrace the ICC, so it is a striking turnaround that they are now the first to give up on it.
But it is the United States that has played the leading role in preventing the ICC from fulfilling the universal mandate for which it was formed, to hold officials of all countries accountable for the worst crimes in the world: genocide; crimes against humanity; and war crimes - not least, international aggression, which the judges at Nuremberg defined as “the supreme international crime”, from which, all other war crimes follow.
As the ICC’s founding father, former Nuremberg prosecutor Benjamin Ferencz, lamented in 2011: “You don’t have to be a criminologist to realize that if you want to deter a crime, you must persuade potential criminals that, if they commit crimes, they will be hauled into court and be held accountable. It is the policy of the US to do just the opposite as far as the crime of aggression is concerned.
"Our government has gone to great pains --- to be sure that no US citizen will be tried by any international criminal court, for the supreme crime of illegal war-making.”
The US has not only refused to accept the jurisdiction of the ICC over its own citizens. It's gone further, pressuring other countries to sign Bilateral Immunity Agreements (BIA), in which they renounce the right to refer US citizens to the ICC for war crimes committed on their territory.
The US has also threatened to cut off US aid to countries that refuse to sign them. The BIAs violate those countries’ own commitments under the ICC statute, and US pressure to sign them, has been rightly condemned: as an outrageous effort to ensure impunity for US war crimes.
Resistance to US Impunity
To the credit of our international neighbours, this US strategy has met with substantial resistance. The European Parliament overwhelmingly passed a resolution, stating that BIAs are incompatible with EU membership, and urging EU- member states and countries seeking EU membership not to sign them.
Fifty-four countries have publicly refused to sign BIAs, and 24 have accepted cut-offs of US aid as a consequence of their refusal. Of 102 countries that have signed a BIA, only 48 are members of the ICC in any case ----- and only 15 of those countries are on record as having ratified the BIAs in their own parliaments.
Thirty-two other ICC members have apparently allowed BIAs to take effect without parliament- ary ratification, but this has been challenged by their own country’s legal experts in many cases.
The US campaign to undermine the ICC is part of a much broader effort by the US government to evade all forms of accountability under the laws that are supposed to govern international behaviour in the modern world --- even as it continues to masquerade as a global champion of the rule of law.
The treaties US policy systematically violates today, were crafted by US statespersons and diplomats, working with foreign colleagues, to build a world where all people will enjoy some basic protections... from the worst atrocities, instead of being subject only to the law of the jungle or “might makes right.”
So current US policy is a cynical betrayal of the work and wisdom of past generations of US citizens, as well as of countless victims over the world to whom we are effectively denying the protections of the UN Charter & Geneva Conventions, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, and many other multilateral treaties our country ignores, violates or refuses to ratify.
Avoiding jurisdiction in international courts is only one of the ways that the US evades international accountability for its criminal behaviour. Another involves an elaborate, well-disguised, public relations campaign that exploits the powerful position of US corporations in the world of commercial media.
Major Propaganda Funding
The US government spends a billion dollars per year on public relations or, more bluntly, propaganda, including $600 million from the Pentagon budget. The work of its PR teams and contractors is laundered by US news- papers --- and repeated and analyzed ad nauseam, by monolithic, flag-waving TV networks.
These profitable corporate operations monopolize the public airwaves in the US, and also use their financial clout, slick marketing, and the support of the US State Department to maintain a power- ful presence in foreign and international media markets.
Foreign media in allied countries provide further legitimacy and credibility to US talking-points and narratives as they echo around the world. Meanwhile, Hollywood fills cinema and TV screens across the world with an idealized, glamorized, inspirational version of the US that still mesmerizes many people.
This whole elaborate “information warfare” machine presents the US as a global leader for democracy, human rights and the rule of law, even as it systematically and catastroph- ically undermines those same principles. It enables our leaders to loudly, persuasively, demonize other countries and their leaders as dangerous violators of international law, even as the US and its allies commit far worse crimes.
Double Standards
The phrase “aggressive war” is also a no-no in the Western media - when the US government launches wars, across international borders. In the past 20 years, the US has violated the UN Charter to attack at least eight countries (Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, Libya & Syria), and the resulting wars, have killed about two million people.
A complex whirlwind of conflict and chaos rages on in all the countries where the US and its allies have lit the flames of war since 2001, but our US leaders still debate new interventions ---- and/or escalations as if we are the fire brigade not the arsonists. (By contrast, the US government and the Western media are quick to accuse Russia or other countries of “aggression” --- even in legally murky situations, such as after the US-backed coup in 2014, that ousted the elected president of Ukraine.)
Systematic violations of the Geneva Conventions are an integral part of US war-making. Most are shrouded in secrecy: the propaganda machine spins the atrocities that slip through into the public record, as a disconnected series of aberrations, accidents and “bad apples,” instead of as the result of illegal rules of engagement and unlawful orders from higher-ups.
The senior officers and civilian officials who are criminally responsible for these crimes in US & international law -- systematically abuse their powerful positions to subvert investigations, cover up their crimes, & avoid any accountability whatsoever.
Pinter’s Complaint
When UK playwright Harold Pinter was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 2005, he bravely and brilliantly used his Nobel lecture to speak about the real role the US plays in the world, and how it whitewashes its crimes. Pinter recounted a meeting at the US Embassy in London in the 1980s in which a senior embassy official, Raymond Seitz, flatly denied US war crimes in Nicaragua ---- for which the US was in fact, convicted of aggression by the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Seitz went on to serve as Assistant Secretary of State, US Ambassador to the UK, and then Vice-Chair of Lehman Brothers.
As Pinter explained: “this ‘policy’ was by no means restricted to Central America. It was conducted throughout the world. It was never-ending. And it is --- as if it never happened.
“The United States supported - and in many cases engendered every rightwing military dictatorship in the world, after the end of the Second World War. I refer to:- Indonesia, Greece, Uruguay, Brazil, Paraguay, Haiti, Turkey, the Philippines, Guatemala, El Salvador, and, of course, Chile. The horror the US inflicted upon Chile in 1973 can never be purged, & can never be forgiven.
“Hundreds of thousands of deaths took place throughout these countries. Did... they take place? & are they in all cases, attributable to US foreign policy? The answer is 'yes', they did take place, and are attributable to American foreign policy. But you wouldn’t know it.
“It never happened. Nothing ever happened. Even while it was happening it wasn’t happ- ening. It didn’t matter. It was of no interest. The crimes of the United States have been systematic, constant, vicious, remorseless, but very few people have actually talked about them. You have to hand it to the US. It has exercised a quite clinical manipulation of power, worldwide, while masquerading... as a force for universal good. It’s a brilliant - even witty - highly successful, act of hypnosis.”
If, in 2016, the world seems to be more violent and chaotic than ever, it's not because the US lacks the will to use force or project power, as both major party candidates for President, & their military advisers appear to believe, but because our leaders have placed too much stock in the illegal threat and use of force, and have lost faith in the rule of law, any international cooperation and diplomacy.
After a century of commercial dominance, & 75 years of investing disproportionately in weapons, military forces & geopolitical schemes, perhaps it is understandable that US leaders have forgotten how to deal fairly and respectfully with our international neighbours. But it's no longer an option, to muddle along, leaving a trail of death, ruin and chaos in our wake, counting on an elaborate propaganda mach- ine, to minimize the blowback on our country and our lives.
Sooner, rather than later, US citizens & our leaders must knuckle down and master the very different attitudes & skills that we will need to become law-abiding global citizens in a peaceful, sustainable, multipolar world.
_________________________________________
Russia ends treaty limiting plutonium production in response to recent US escalation of hostility Fort Russ News - Topwar.ru - Lenta - News.Ru - translated by J. Arnoldski
TopWar: On October 3rd, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a decree on suspending compliance with the agreement with the US on disposing weapons-grade plutonium. The main reason for this decision was pointed out as the “unfriendly attitude of the US towards Russia.”
Sources from the State Duma have reported that Russia is ready to resume the agreement, if the US cancels all the anti-Russian sanctions. Plus, Russia demands that the US reduce its military contingent in Europe, before Russia resumes compliance with the protocols. The State Duma’s statement reads:
“Acting according to the agreement and the protocols of the agreement can be resumed after the US eliminates the reasons which led to this radical change in circumstances: after the US reduces its military infrastructure and the number of its troop contingents deployed on the territory of the NATO countries having joined NATO after September 1st, 2000, down to the level at which they were on the day that the agreement and its protocols entered force.
"Since then NATO has grown to encompass 9 states of Eastern Europe. Just around the corner is NATO’s 10th state to be included since 2000 - Montenegro.”
In addition, Russia has demanded, as one of its conditions, that Washington cancel the so-call- ed Magnitsky Act.
there's a big difference between the news, and the truth - if you want the latest news and the truth, say, on Brazil - then please go to our One Union page.
________________________________
US/UK elite bankrolled A. Hitler
Germans were paid in company shares for loans that managed Germany's war reparations -- thus US capital began to actively integrate into the German economy.
The total amount of foreign investment in German industry during 1924-1929 amounted to almost 63 billion gold Marks (30 billion was accounted for by loans), and the payment of reparations — 10 billion Marks. 70% of revenues were provided by bankers from the US, and most banks were from JP Morgan.
As a result, in 1929, German industry was in second place in the world, but it was largely in the hands of the USA's leading financial-industrial groups.
"Interessen-Gemeinschaft Farbenindustrie", main supplier of the German war machine, financed 45% of the election campaign of Hitler in 1930, and was under the control of Rockefeller's "Standard oil".
Morgan, through "General Electric", controlled the German radio and electrical industry, via AEG and Siemens (up to 1933, 30% of the shares of AEG were owned by "General Electric") and through the Telecom company ITT — 40% of the 'phone network in Germany.
In addition, they owned a 30% stake in the air- craft manufacturing company "Focke-Wulf".
"General Motors", belonging to the DuPont family, established control over "Opel".
Henry Ford controlled 100% of the shares of Volkswagen. In 1926, with the participation of the Rockefeller Bank, Dillon, Reed & Co, the second largest industrial monopoly in Germany, after I.G Farben, merged with metals group, "Vereinigte Stahlwerke" (Steel trust) plus Thyssen, Flick, Wolff, Feglera etc.
US co-operation with Germany's military- industrial complex, was so intense and pervasive, that by 1933, the key sectors of German industry, & large banks such as the Deutsche Bank, Dresdner Bank, Donat Bank, etc, were all under the control of US financial capital.
The political force that was intended to play a crucial role in the Anglo-American plans was being simultaneously prepared.
We are talking about the funding of the Nazi party and A. Hitler personally.
As former German Chancellor Brüning wrote in his memoirs, from 1923, Hitler received large sums from abroad. Where they went, is not known, but they were received through Swiss and Swedish banks.
It is also known that, in 1922 in Munich, a meeting took place between A. Hitler and the military attache of the US to Germany -- Captain Truman Smith -- who compiled a detailed report for his Washington superiors (in the office of military intelligence), in which he spoke highly of Hitler.
Through Smith's circle of acquaintances, A. Hitler was introduced to Ernst Franz Sedgwick Hanfstaengl, (Putzie), --- a graduate of Harvard University who played an important role in the formation of A. Hitler as a politician, rendered him significant financial support, and secured for him, acquaintance & communication with, senior British figures.
Hitler was prepared politically, but, as Germany reigned in prosperity, his party remained on the periphery of public life... The situation changed dramatically with the beginning of 'the crisis'.
In the autumn of 1929, the collapse of the US stock exchange was triggered by the Federal Reserve, and the next stage of the Anglo-US financial circles' strategy, had started.
The Federal Reserve and JP Morgan, decided to stop lending to Germany --- inspired by the bank crisis & economic depression in Central Europe.
In September 1931, England abandoned the gold standard, deliberately destroying international payments systems and completely cutting off "financial oxygen" to the Weimar Republic.
But a financial miracle occurred for the Nazi party: in September 1930 as a result of large donations by Thyssen and I.G. Farben --- the party got 6.4 million votes & took 2nd place in the Reichstag;- after this, more generous investments from abroad were activated.
The main link between the major German industrialists and foreign financiers, became H. Schacht.
On January 4th, 1932, a meeting was held with the largest English financier, a Mr M. Norman, A. Hitler, and von Papen, which concluded a secret agreement on the financing of the NSDAP.
This meeting was also attended by US policy-makers, the Dulles brothers --- something their biographers do not like to mention.
On January 14th, 1933, a meeting between Hitler, Schroder, Papen & Kepler took place, where Hitler's program was fully approved. It was here that they finally resolved the issue of the transfer of power to the Nazis, and on 30th January, A. Hitler became Chancellor.
The implementation of the next stage of the strategy thus began.
The attitude of Anglo-American ruling circles to the new government was very sympathetic. When Hitler refused to pay reparations, which naturally called into question the payment of war debts, neither the UK or France pressed their payment claims.
Moreover, after a visit to the US in May 1933, H. Schacht was placed, again, at the head of the Reichsbank, and, after his meeting with the President and the biggest bankers on Wall Street, the US allocated Germany new loans --- totalling $1 billion.
In June, during a trip to London & a meeting with M. Norman, Schacht sought an English loan of $2 billion and a reduction and then the cessation of payments, on old loans.
Thus, the Nazis got what they could not achieve with the previous government.
In the summer of 1934, Britain signed the Anglo- German transfer agreement, which became one of the foundations of British policy towards the Third Reich, &, at the end of the 30's, Germany became the main trading partner of England.
Schroeder Bank became Germany's main agent in the UK & in 1936 his New York office teamed up with the Rockefellers, to create Schroeder, Rockefeller & Co. investment Bank, which the Times magazine called the Berlin-Rome "economic propagandist axis".
As Hitler himself admitted, he conceived his 4- year plan on the basis of foreign financial loans, so it never inspired him with the slightest alarm.
In August 1934, US Standard oil acquired 730,000 acres of land in Germany... then built large oil refineries which supplied the Nazis with oil.
At the same time, Germany secretly took delivery of the most modern equipment for aircraft factories, from the US, which would begin producing German planes.
Germany gained large numbers of military patents from US firms Pratt and Whitney, Douglas, and Curtis Wright --- and it was US technology, building the Junkers-87.
In 1941 --- as world war ll was raging --- US investments in Germany's economy amounted to $475 million. Standard oil invested - 120 million, General motors - $35 million, ITT - $30 million, and Ford - $17.5 million.
The close financial & economic co-operation of Anglo-American and Nazi business circles, was the backdrop against which, in the 30's, a policy of appeasement led to world war II.
Today, as the world's financial elite begins to implement the 'Great depression 2' plan with its subsequent transition to the "new world order", identifying its key role in the organization of crimes against humanity, becomes a priority.
Yuri Rubtsov is a doctor of historical sciences, academician of the Academy of military sciences, & a member of the International Association of historians of world war II.
FREE POLITICAL PRISONER LEONARD PELTIER NOW!!!
Indigenous rights activist Leonard Peltier,
in prison in the US for 38 years, received the first international human rights prize of Uruguay's Mario Benedetti Foundation.
At a ceremony in Montevideo, where the winner was announced, the human rights group calls Peltier the longest-serving political prisoner in the Americas, AFP reports.
Peltier, a Native American activist who was a member of the American Indian Movement (AIM), was convicted in 1977 for the alleged murder of two US FBI agents during a 1975 shootout on the
Pine Ridge Reservation in S. Dakota.
He was sentenced to 2 consecutive terms of life imprisonment.
"Leonard Peltier, who on September 12th, 2014, turned 70, has spent over half his life in prison. He's a symbol of resistance to repressive state policies by the US, where there are people in jail for ethnic, racial, religious & ideological reasons," the foundation's statement says.
Ricardo Elena, a member of the foundation's honorary board, says Peltier's case "is one that is repeated over and over: violation (of rights), persecution, eviction, invasion and expropriation of indigenous people, from the time it was 'discovered', until now.
"It doesn't just happen in the United States; it is happening in southern South America, with the (indigenous) Mapuche people, and with indigenous people in North America," he states.
Elena says the United States "likes to think it's the seat of democracy, but it has political prisoners just like a dictatorship might have."
The Mario Benedetti Foundation was founded to support human rights and cultural causes in line with the work of the Uruguayan writer after whom it was named, who died in 2009.
Peltier is incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania.
James Swan, the head of the Black Hills chapter of the United Urban Warrior Society - a nonprofit group that helps Native Americans fight racial discrimination and injustice - describes Peltier as a political prisoner whose case needs to be reviewed by an independent body.
"What we want people to realize is that this is an injustice," AP quotes Swan as saying.
Peltier, 66, was given two life sentences in '77, on false charges of killing 2 FBI agents.
Peltier asserts that he is innocent and the FBI framed him for political reasons, especially for his activities as a member of the Native American Movement. He has lodged numerous appeals against the conviction - but all unsuccessfully.
He's been denied parole again and again, and will not be eligible for it again until 2024, when he turns 79.
Peltier's relatives say he suffers a number of health problems such as diabetes, arthritis, and the loss of vision in an eye after a minor stroke.
Many activists say Leonard Peltier is the most important political prisoner in the US.
In a review of the US' human rights record, at a United Nations Human Rights Council UPR conference in Geneva, a group called for a new trial for him.
The US Human Rights Network filed a 423-page submission to the Geneva meeting about him.
One item, entitled “Political Repression - Political Prisoners,” about 1970's cases, indicts the FBI: accusing COINTELPRO of “maiming, murdering, false prosecutions and frame-ups, destruction and mayhem throughout the country.”
It cites the FBI for targeting the Puerto Rican Independence Front, the Black Panther Party, the Weather Underground, the American Indian Movement, the Black Liberation Army, as well as “peace activists and everyone in between,” and says “many of today's political prisoners” in the US were jailed indefinitely as a result.
Repression has grown since 9/11, it says.
The political repression paper demands an “immediate criminal investigation into the conspiracy,” and also new trials for two aged activists jailed on murder charges, Mumia Abu Jamal and Leonard Peltier.
